QuestingBeast
Junior Member
Hm, there are more Red Knights than I'd anticipated.
No matter, this only means my boy may find more friends.
No matter, this only means my boy may find more friends.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I was hoping once the main positions of Grandmaster, Eyes, King, Queen, Heir and perhaps Bride/Groom. I'm leaving prince/princesses out because I wouldn't count them as terribly important.raspberryrose said:Thanks for the approval! xD
At what point would the rp be started? As in, is there a certain character minimum or when each position gets filled, etc.?
OK I can change it right nowraspberryrose said:@Robyn Banks
Hey, on a rather minor note, can I ask that for the rp you don't use blue text on a black background? It doesn't really matter for the CS but it is rather hard for me to read. Thank you!
While that sounds like a good idea, I already had a jumping off point planned. I could have just a young king alongside a Bride/Groom but I would say that the ruling party needs to have been established.Robyn Banks] [URL="https://www.rpnation.com/profile/21016-floatingaroundspace/ said:@FloatingAroundSpace[/URL]
Honestly worst case scenario I don't think A king and queen would be that important. I would say that the king died in some fashion. so the heir will take the throne. The queen could be alive or died years ago.The Rp can start when the king is decease and everyone receives word of it or the day of the coronation.
The Yellow Crows are growing bold.raspberryrose said:
Ok that's fine that was kind of a last resort if there isn't a king and/or queen.FloatingAroundSpace said:While that sounds like a good idea, I already had a jumping off point planned. I could have just a young king alongside a Bride/Groom but I would say that the ruling party needs to have been established.
As yellow eyes is not a normal eye color for humans, I don't think anyone has listed yellow as their eye color. Has anyone? I looked back and I don't think anyone has.raspberryrose said:hmmm.. I like it
another thing that I've seen a couple times is the eye color for the Yellow Crows? Do they all have yellow eyes? Does the magic affect their eyes or is yellow just a common color in the population? Speaking of magic, does using magic show any physical signs beyond the magic itself, as in, does it physically affect the body in any way?
So... I wasn't going to mention this, but maybe it's worth bringing up so it can at least be clarified since you guys are both kinda talking as though it's assumed the KING would be the ruler by blood and not the Queen... If we've got typical Medieval sexism going on here, then shouldn't the heir be male? Male children come before females in the line of succession (even in modern times, though I admit I'm basing that entirely on England's monarchy). If all the royal children are female then the oldest may or may not have been the heir historically, depending on what period of history you use as reference, but if a female heir has a younger brother that's maybe a bit strange?FloatingAroundSpace said:... I could have just a young king alongside a Bride/Groom ...
What you say makes sense. Of course the king will be seen as the one in control no matter what even if the heir is a woman so yeah I agree.Irianne said:So... I wasn't going to mention this, but maybe it's worth mentioning so it can at least be clarified since you guys are both kinda talking as though it's assumed the KING would be the ruler by blood and not the Queen... If we've got typical Medieval sexism going on here, then shouldn't the heir be male? Male children come before females in the line of succession (even in modern times, though I admit I'm basing that entirely on England's monarchy). If all the royal children are female then the oldest may or may not have been the heir historically, depending on what period of history you use as reference, but if a female heir has a younger brother that's maybe a bit strange?
Even Queen Mary I, who was England's first female monarch, was really only co-ruler with her husband, so that might also be another angle you could play with with the Groom, if you wanted to.
I touched on it in the Charter Sign-up thread that this would have classical medieval sexism ie fewer female Red Knights because female children would be killed and that the king would be the face of the monarchy more than the queen because the male has to be the strong one. However, I don't mind having the heir be female simply because I figured a monarchy based on magical power would put less emphasis on what gender the first child is and just want them to be strong. Once again, an RP so you gotta suspend your disbelief somewhere. The Groom would have to be groomed (no pun intended) to act like the leader even though it is the female heir's blood link if that makes sense.Irianne said:So... I wasn't going to mention this, but maybe it's worth bringing up so it can at least be clarified since you guys are both kinda talking as though it's assumed the KING would be the ruler by blood and not the Queen... If we've got typical Medieval sexism going on here, then shouldn't the heir be male? Male children come before females in the line of succession (even in modern times, though I admit I'm basing that entirely on England's monarchy). If all the royal children are female then the oldest may or may not have been the heir historically, depending on what period of history you use as reference, but if a female heir has a younger brother that's maybe a bit strange?
Even some of the Medieval queens who "ruled" in their own right were actually only co-rulers with their husband who was expected to actually handle things (Queen Mary I of England, Queen Isabella of Castile, Queen Mary II of England, etc.) so if we do have a female heir that could also be another angle you could play with with the Groom, if you wanted to.
It makes perfect sense. Thanks for the clarification.FloatingAroundSpace said:I touched on it in the Charter Sign-up thread that this would have classical medieval sexism ie fewer female Red Knights because female children would be killed and that the king would be the face of the monarchy more than the queen because the male has to be the strong one. However, I don't mind having the heir be female simply because I figured a monarchy based on magical power would put less emphasis on what gender the first child is and just want them to be strong. Once again, an RP so you gotta suspend your disbelief somewhere. The Groom would have to be groomed (no pun intended) to act like the leader even though it is the female heir's blood link if that makes sense.
I just wanted to recognize this specifically cuz it's awesome. I love it.FloatingAroundSpace said:Because the future husband/wife of the heir will be chosen fairly early in life, the royals are careful to keep quiet about whether or not the heir is male or female. This has been tradition in Decucis and a grand ceremony is held when the male of the pair turns eighteen to crown him the heir. Even so, the one with the blood ties to the royal family is generally in control. The female heir may pull their husband's strings and the groom will be encouraged to listen to her and made more docile.