Shreb
Buffer Overflower
That moment when you've made your 30th OC for a role-play, and start mixing up backstories.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I agree with all of this. I don't mind slice of life, but 9 times out of 10 I'm looking for some sort of adventure. My life is already too normal and "same", so it's nice to do something different for a change.Senshin said:I'm usually open to any verse of role-play. The only ones I'm not interested in participating in, are ones that are oriented around daily activities, or slice of life. I have nothing negative to say about these, I'm just searching for an experience that takes me out of life's spectrum all together when I RP.
As for things role-players do. Godmodding, and auto-hitting during contests are a big one. Generally one that everyone has an issue with, too.
When role-players assume the important role of a canon character in a fandom, and either abuse said characters power, or don't portray said character with a shade of accuracy. I think if you're going to contribute to a fandom, then you need to do at least a little research on your character if it's canon. Of course, this can be dependent on your communities standards.
An elitist attitude. Like any game, RP also has its elitists. This kind of attitude sours the experience for new players, and to the most extreme extent, can cause unnecessary drama in a world some have chosen to immerse themselves in as a getaway from everyday life.
As Flintlock above stated, post-length. It's something to be mindful of. When role-players respond to a full wall of text with a one-liner, or vice-versa. It's good to know what's generally considered acceptable, in the game you're playing.
I agree. Assuming control of another's character in any form (outside of some form of an in-character ability, though even this should be exercised carefully) is a huge role-play sin. This type of player generally centers the entire RP around themselves, and attempts to dictate player responses accordingly to their desired outcome. This was an excellent point to make.SpartFakles said:I agree with all of this. I don't mind slice of life, but 9 times out of 10 I'm looking for some sort of adventure. My life is already too normal and "same", so it's nice to do something different for a change.
I hate all of the above. Especially godmodding. Especially wen they write something that they should allow you to respond to, but they don't and just assume what your character was going to do/say in reaction. It bugs me because sometimes I'll read something and already think about how I want a character to respond when all of a sudden they'll just assume a reaction that's completely different. If my character would scream at something, but my rp partner just assumes the character would brush it off- that's just not groovy in my book.
Exactly. Thank you for wording that better. I know sometimes it's hard to write long paragraphs in detailed rps sometimes, but it's no excuse to control someone's character so they can continue. You can take more time to paint a full picture of what's going on before reaching the point were the other character needs to react in some way.Senshin said:I agree. Assuming control of another's character in any form (outside of some form of an in-character ability, though even this should be exercised carefully) is a huge role-play sin. This type of player generally centers the entire RP around themselves, and attempts to dictate player responses accordingly to their desired outcome. This was an excellent point to make.
I dislike that too. I never understood the drive to play as the perfect character. It limits character growth, and makes character engagement less interesting. If someone wants their character to be received, and respected as a strong individual, that can happen without the character being absolutely flawless. In fact when those flaws are revealed, it can deepen character interest and drive a story in unique ways.SpartFakles said:Exactly. Thank you for wording that better. I know sometimes it's hard to write long paragraphs in detailed rps sometimes, but it's no excuse to control someone's character so they can continue. You can take more time to paint a full picture of what's going on before reaching the point were the other character needs to react in some way.
That and Mary/Gary Sue/Stu characters are my biggest pet peeves.
I completely agree with your entire above post, but this last bit struck a sweet chord with me as this is my number one pet peeve...roguepanic said:That and forced romance. Ugh.
Yeah. I find especially as a creator it drags the roleplay down because in the end even if their character isn't 'demanding' all the focus on them the focus automatically goes to them because everyone wants their character to stop being all complain-y. I actually hosted a roleplay on a different site that died a super premature death because one character was being super whiny to the point where I had to talk privately with the user controlling the character about it after having repeatedly been told by other roleplayers it was annoying. When I tried to tell them nicely they freaked out and continued to do their thing and then everyone ended up leaving. *the site I used had tricky rules for kicking people out so I couldn't do it unfortunately since they weren't 'technically' violating any rules* I still cringe at the thought of it.Stormlight said:It does get me riled up, if someone demands all the focus, all the time. May it be with a cold, distant, hurt, mentally handicapped or physically handicapped character. *runs away crying*
No, but I believe that is one I hate too. A while back I used to play a game which I roleplayed in, and there was a roleplay I was in. It was a group roleplay, (4 people including me, of which 2 of them were my friends and the other was someone who wanted to roleplay with us), and the person who asked to roleplay with us kept just posting random stuff in their posts, and basically leaving the plot progression to us. It was really annoying, but luckily the person left a bit afterwards and we were left to our own resources and had a pretty decent roleplay.CinnamonShards said:Has anyone said "When your partner(s) leave you to do all of the world building/plot progression" yet?
I completely agree with the last one. Even worse is when the owner creates the rp, only posts once or twice, and then disappears. I mean, you're the owner; don't you want the rp to flourish? Even worse is when the owner doesn't post at all in the IC thread. I'm not kidding, I've actually participated in an rp where that happened.Nepence said:No, but I believe that is one I hate too. A while back I used to play a game which I roleplayed in, and there was a roleplay I was in. It was a group roleplay, (4 people including me, of which 2 of them were my friends and the other was someone who wanted to roleplay with us), and the person who asked to roleplay with us kept just posting random stuff in their posts, and basically leaving the plot progression to us. It was really annoying, but luckily the person left a bit afterwards and we were left to our own resources and had a pretty decent roleplay.
As for what type of people I hate in roleplays, there's one more. When people get out of character. I know, pretty childish reason, but it's annoying when the person roleplaying their character actually just doesn't follow the personality of their roleplay character.
AKA you have a character that is cheerful and happy all the time, but suddenly they're sad and distant for 2 days or something, and for no reason at all. It just makes me go like "What are you actually doing?".
As for roleplays, the ones I hate most are those that are actually left to rot without being informed. Like the owner just simply doesn't care. One day the roleplay is going on perfectly, and the other it just dies. I don't know why they would do that, maybe they have a reason, but at least they could state it in a post.
like do you mean when people make it so like 16 year olds are somehow uber professional ( mages/superheroes/defenders of humanity) ?Scylla said:Once again, age ranges with no justifications. However, it's fine in say, a school RP or a darker and edgier RP.
Scylla said:Once again, age ranges with no justifications. However, it's fine in say, a school RP or a darker and edgier RP.
Gotta love those 7 year-old professional sharpshooters!readingraebow said:like do you mean when people make it so like 16 year olds are somehow uber professional ( mages/superheroes/defenders of humanity) ?
See that makes since though that the adults would take the lead and the kids would give push back. That's in the nature of teenagers. I was talking about where you have this fourteen year old that have either godlike intelligence and is practically a ninja/doctor/lawyer/scientist all without completing high school. Or they have completed high school at like age six and are full professionals in their areas of expertise by the time the roleplay starts.Sleipnir said:I once was in an RPG where most of the other characters were in their teens or younger. I had the only two characters over 20. The situation was a survival thing in the wild, and both characters were experienced, since they were national park rangers, but since this was the case, the guy sort of started coming out as the leader of the group and almost had an emotional break down several times because as I once expressed to the group, he basically viewed himself as this huge group's babysitter and if something happened to one of them, he'd feel responsible.
It didn't help that a few of the kids, being teens, were pretty belligerent and didn't want to give him the time of day.