Fairy Tail: A Fandom OOC

4-5 Year timeskip later?

  • No, gtfo.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Do not vote for this, this is simply a thing to show I'm changing it to 2yrs k tnx

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Kyuubey said:
Well Sora is the oldest S-Rank in this RP in Fairy Tail who is active (I don't count Sera since hers varies) so I think it's only fair she stay that way. That's just my opinion though.
I'd say two or three (three at a push) S-Class mage's per guild and leave it at that tbh. No guild had just one S-Class in the show after all :3
 
LeSoraAmari said:
I'd say two or three (three at a push) S-Class mage's per guild and leave it at that tbh. No guild had just one S-Class in the show after all :3
I'll roll with whatever Mitchu decides. ~
 
Kyuubey said:
I'll roll with whatever Mitchu decides. ~
Same~


Really though, Fairy Tail only has two S-Class anyway. Bizma is inactive and Sera varies. Plus, Clair is a Wizard Saint so although classed as one, she isn't one really. xD
 
LeSoraAmari said:
I'd say two or three (three at a push) S-Class mage's per guild and leave it at that tbh. No guild had just one S-Class in the show after all :3
Then nothing changes. We already have two or three S-ranks per guild. In Fairy Tail there was only ever one S-rank that was an actual character and that was Erza. Every other S-rank was a plot device that only showed up every now and then.
 
Colt556 said:
Then nothing changes. We already have two or three S-ranks per guild. In Fairy Tail there was only ever one S-rank that was an actual character and that was Erza. Every other S-rank was a plot device that only showed up every now and then.
The fact of the matter is that there were still numerous S-Class mage's in each guild. And as for that, the only S-Class Mage that was a plot device was Gildarts. Laxus, Erza, and Mirajane were part of the main cast lmao
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LeSoraAmari said:
The fact of the matter is that there were still numerous S-Class mage's in each guild. And as for that, the only S-Class Mage that was a plot device was Gildarts, Laxus, Erza, and Mirajane were part of the main cast lmao
Gildarts was almost never around, you could go 50 chapters without ever even seeing him. Same for Laxus. Mirajane only took part in big guild-wide arcs. Erza was the only S-rank among the main cast.
 
Colt556 said:
Gildarts was almost never around, you could go 50 chapters without ever even seeing him. Same for Laxus. Mirajane only took part in big guild-wide arcs. Erza was the only S-rank among the main cast.
K
 
Kayzo said:
Why don't we limit the amount of S class wizards everyone can have?
Since people obviously don't want to give up their S-ranks it's probably best to just leave it. We've managed this long with S-rank spam, as much as I dislike it it's not exactly rp-killing, it just limits possibilities is all. Forcing people to make changes they don't agree with would be more detrimental to the rp than the power creep in the end.
 
I think we should stop talking about this whole 'power creep' issue all the time and talk about something else. It's draining.
 
LeSoraAmari said:
I think we should stop talking about this whole 'power creep' issue all the time and talk about something else. It's draining.
This is the first and only time we've ever talked about it though.
 
LeSoraAmari said:
I think we should stop talking about this whole 'power creep' issue all the time and talk about something else. It's draining.
Be that as it may, we can't just ignore it. It's something that we have to confront head on, otherwise it won't go away and could potentially cause problems in the future
 
Colt556 said:
This is the first and only time we've ever talked about it though.
You bring it up all the time

Rhodus said:
Be that as it may, we can't just ignore it. It's something that we have to confront head on, otherwise it won't go away and could potentially cause problems in the future
Everythings been fine thus far, I don't see any need to change anything. If people abuse their characters powers then do I think we should change it. As of now, I think everything's fine.


It will only annoy people if they're told they have to rework their character because it's deemed 'too powerful' and thus had to be moved down a couple of ranks. I'm thinking of the long term issues it could cause for the roleplay, and something like this could cause a major lose in the activity of the roleplay. I've seen it many times before.
 
LeSoraAmari said:
You bring it up all the time
Everythings been fine thus far, I don't see any need to change anything. If people abuse their characters powers then do I think we should change it. As of now, I think everything's fine.


It will only annoy people if they're told they have to rework their character because it's deemed 'too powerful' and thus had to be moved down a couple of ranks. I'm thinking of the long term issues it could cause for the roleplay, and something like this could cause a major lose in the activity of the roleplay. I've seen it many times before.
I've mentioned it like three times and there was never a discussion prior to this, just me commenting on it when the power creep caused noticeable problems in the RP. Also there isn't any re-working involved other than swapping an S or 'Wizard Saint' to A rank.
 
Colt556 said:
I've mentioned it like three times and there was never a discussion prior to this, just me commenting on it when the power creep caused noticeable problems in the RP. Also there isn't any re-working involved other than swapping an S or 'Wizard Saint' to A rank.
You mention it all the time.


There could potentially be a ton of reworking one would need to make. They could potentially have to change abilities, spells, and a whole load of other things to fit that ranking. It's not as simple as just swapping the rank on the CS.
 
<p><a href="<fileStore.core_Attachment>/monthly_2016_07/image.jpeg.2798f73ecd3b0123da55320432a13602.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="144417" src="<fileStore.core_Attachment>/monthly_2016_07/image.jpeg.2798f73ecd3b0123da55320432a13602.jpeg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt=""></a></p>

 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    234.9 KB · Views: 14

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top