Elffri3nd
BLACKJACK!
Picture wizard find me a picture plsColt556 said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Picture wizard find me a picture plsColt556 said:
Uhhhmmm...? Who dismisses a story about attempted double homicide as a joke?Wyatt said:Yep, shush it has worked for t.v. before, just go with it
This really doesn't explain why he would be let go for no reason though tbhJackaboi said:Maybe authorities might be too preoccupied by what ever plot thing @Salt Lord has in store for us
A last second escape while they're distracted?Kazehana said:Uhhhmmm...? Who dismisses a story about attempted double homicide as a joke?
This really doesn't explain why he would be let go for no reason though tbh
At any rate I have Vex to fall back onKazehana said:Uhhhmmm...? Who dismisses a story about attempted double homicide as a joke?
This really doesn't explain why he would be let go for no reason though tbh
Would not happen, he just turned himself inJackaboi said:A last second escape while they're distracted?
Jackaboi said:A last second escape while they're distracted?
^ ThisWyatt said:Would not happen, he just turned himself in
I remember about one or two months ago we had a discussion were we (mostly the active people) talked about Kim and her 'Magic' and how Nullification magic wouldn't get rid of her Taint. I have no idea why I bring this up but you know.Colt556 said:Well I did specifically design Gilad to hard-counter mages in general.
What picture?Wyatt said:Picture wizard find me a picture pls
A cool picture to use for Vex, I might want to redo his appearance. A blind person with a bird if possible or a person with a birdColt556 said:What picture?
Eh, it was the opposite. Magic is magic, the 'taint' stuff is simply a component of magic. It'd get negated same as any other aspect of magic. I mean Gilad's magic negation was never said to only negate the ... I guess "positive" charged magic. It just negates all magic.purplepanda288 said:I remember about one or two months ago we had a discussion were we (mostly the active people) talked about Kim and her 'Magic' and how Nullification magic wouldn't get rid of her Taint. I have no idea why I bring this up but you know.
I'll do a quick search and see if I can find anything.Wyatt said:A cool picture to use for Vex, I might want to redo his appearance. A blind person with a bird if possible or a person with a bird
Just for my own curiosity, what about products of magic that aren't magic themselves? Like if someone conjured a chair, and the magic was far gone, would the chair remain even if he exerted his power?Colt556 said:Eh, it was the opposite. Magic is magic, the 'taint' stuff is simply a component of magic. It'd get negated same as any other aspect of magic. I mean Gilad's magic negation was never said to only negate the ... I guess "positive" charged magic. It just negates all magic.
Basically, there isn't a single thing for any character that can't be negated. The only thing would be that the more powerful the magic, the harder it is to negate. So the only possible way to have something magical that can't be negated would be for it to simply be SO powerful that Gilad simply doesn't have the magical capacity to negate it.
I'll do a quick search and see if I can find anything.
Well you didn't specify any sort of characteristics for what the guy looked like, so here's a bunch of men with birds.Wyatt said:A cool picture to use for Vex, I might want to redo his appearance. A blind person with a bird if possible or a person with a bird
Colt556 said:Well you didn't specify any sort of characteristics for what the guy looked like, so here's a bunch of men with birds.
Those are great
I don't remember the part where we agreed that taint would be a negative ( Edit: negative charged form) of magic. Taint is the complete opposite of magic, they cancel each other out. I see where your coming from but, let's say, just let me give you an example yes? Let's say that magic is a light source and that light source is shinging. Now let's say I put a cube, the cube is a Mage using magic, that cube casts a shadow. That shadow is taint, it's a biproduct of light. and now let's hay that of I shine light on the other side of the box where the shadow. The shadow disappears.Colt556 said:Eh, it was the opposite. Magic is magic, the 'taint' stuff is simply a component of magic. It'd get negated same as any other aspect of magic. I mean Gilad's magic negation was never said to only negate the ... I guess "positive" charged magic. It just negates all magic.
Basically, there isn't a single thing for any character that can't be negated. The only thing would be that the more powerful the magic, the harder it is to negate. So the only possible way to have something magical that can't be negated would be for it to simply be SO powerful that Gilad simply doesn't have the magical capacity to negate it.
I'll do a quick search and see if I can find anything.
I see your a big fan of Kim and Duncan's shenanigans aren't ya.purplepanda288 said:I don't remember the part where we agreed that taint would be a negative ( Edit: negative charged form) of magic. Taint is the complete opposite of magic, they cancel each other out. I see where your coming from but, let's say, just let me give you an example yes? Let's say that magic is a light source and that light source is shinging. Now let's say I put a cube, the cube is a Mage using magic, that cube casts a shadow. That shadow is taint, it's a biproduct of light. and now let's hay that of I shine light on the other side of the box where the shadow. The shadow disappears.
As far as I'm aware, anything conjured through magic is magical itself. As such anything summoned via magic would be able to be negated. Like, if you used requip to pull out a sword Gilad could probably prevent you from requiping if he was fast enough. But once you had that sword out, as the sword itself is not a magical construct, he wouldn't be able to negate it. However for Ferra's munch magic, if she created a sword through her magic then the sword would, itself, be magic and thus able to be negated. For things like celestial spirits they themselves probably can't be negated simply because they're just that strong, however the gateway allowing them to be here probably could be negated. And like the requip scenario he could negate the attempt at summoning if he's fast enough. I do not believe negation works on magical items, though. Like, if you had an enchanted sword I don't think he can negate the enchantment. But, for example, if your enchanted sword could shoot lightning then that lightning he could negate.Kazehana said:Just for my own curiosity, what about products of magic that aren't magic themselves? Like if someone conjured a chair, and the magic was far gone, would the chair remain even if he exerted his power?
We're going to need a bigger boat...Metaphysics said:
What about Raa's shift magic? Going through this example, the magic enforces the change but does not maintain it since the change has already occurred. So since it's there already and it's technically not magic does that mean null does not work on shifted material?Colt556 said:As far as I'm aware, anything conjured through magic is magical itself. As such anything summoned via magic would be able to be negated. Like, if you used requip to pull out a sword Gilad could probably prevent you from requiping if he was fast enough. But once you had that sword out, as the sword itself is not a magical construct, he wouldn't be able to negate it. However for Ferra's munch magic, if she created a sword through her magic then the sword would, itself, be magic and thus able to be negated. For things like celestial spirits they themselves probably can't be negated simply because they're just that strong, however the gateway allowing them to be here probably could be negated. And like the requip scenario he could negate the attempt at summoning if he's fast enough. I do not believe negation works on magical items, though. Like, if you had an enchanted sword I don't think he can negate the enchantment. But, for example, if your enchanted sword could shoot lightning then that lightning he could negate.
In short, if it's magic he can probably negate it.
Yes, yes I amMetaphysics said:I see your a big fan of Kim and Duncan's shenanigans aren't ya.
Watching Druidz atm.purplepanda288 said:Yes, yes I am
Ahh gotchaColt556 said:As far as I'm aware, anything conjured through magic is magical itself. As such anything summoned via magic would be able to be negated. Like, if you used requip to pull out a sword Gilad could probably prevent you from requiping if he was fast enough. But once you had that sword out, as the sword itself is not a magical construct, he wouldn't be able to negate it. However for Ferra's munch magic, if she created a sword through her magic then the sword would, itself, be magic and thus able to be negated. For things like celestial spirits they themselves probably can't be negated simply because they're just that strong, however the gateway allowing them to be here probably could be negated. And like the requip scenario he could negate the attempt at summoning if he's fast enough. I do not believe negation works on magical items, though. Like, if you had an enchanted sword I don't think he can negate the enchantment. But, for example, if your enchanted sword could shoot lightning then that lightning he could negate.
In short, if it's magic he can probably negate it.
MY BRAIN!Kazehana said:Ahh gotcha
One last super specific example because I just thought of it: What if Mimi tried to reflect his negation? Would it reflect it back at him, thus negating his negation?
MY BRAIN!Kazehana said:Ahh gotcha
One last super specific example because I just thought of it: What if Mimi tried to reflect his negation? Would it reflect it back at him, thus negating his negation?
SAME BUT I HAVE TO KNOWpurplepanda288 said:MY BRAIN!
True true! What was I doing? Oh ya, writing a post for my charactersKazehana said:SAME BUT I HAVE TO KNOW