Axel The Englishman
The Holy Crusader
I think it's more respectful that you don't take a deceased family member's corpse without consent and start experimenting with it all willy nilly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My unpopular opinion?
I'm a teenager and on the more conservative side (more Republican) ^^;
Well obviously you have to get consent first, but it needs to be from the person before they die, not their family. All I'm saying is that it's silly not to give your body to science. There is no reason not to.I think it's more respectful that you don't take a deceased family member's corpse without consent and start experimenting with it all willy nilly.
unpopular opinion American horror story always has been and always will be trash
Remind me why I stopped watching TV. I just lost interest in the shows.Can we add Supernatural to that as well? God, there's so much bad TV out these days.
Because Star Trek reruns are only fun until the fourth time?Remind me why I stopped watching TV. I just lost interest in the shows.
My unpopular opinion?
I'm a teenager and on the more conservative side (more Republican) ^^;
*rubs hands together*The wage gap is simply the average earnings of men and women working full time. It does not account for different job rankings/positions, hours worked, or different jobs altogether. It has nothing to do with neither inequality nor discrimination. Furthermore, if it was truly, legally able to pay woman less, then surely all firms, companies and businesses would hire women rather than men. I see a lot of women enrolling into Gender Studies courses, which do not secure much jobs, so maybe that's why they earn less.
I hate the 'wage gap' thing that I keep seeing in freedomland.
-Communists (Should actually consider self-euthanization if you're one of these, makes America's job easier)
That's edgy as fuck.
From the above, I understood that women are weak in the pay negotiating tycoon field because of gender roles and public pressure. Then it isn't systematical sexism in the markets. Instead, it's just social awkwardness, it's just societal pressure. It has nothing to do with legal laws and or bills allowing for less pay towards women. There is an earnings gap, but it isn't due to sexism, prejudice, the law, bills, legislations, etc.1. Pay negotiations. Most occupations don't have a flat pay that everyone takes, they overwhelmingly have the ability for pay raises and bonuses to encourage productivity. The problem is that someone can have their attempts for a raise denied, and it's difficult to prove it was discrimination. But that's under the assumption it was malicious, or that it was the employer's fault. There's other studies that have looked into the behaviours of men and women regarding negotiations, finding that men were more likely to argue for a higher pay and a much higher pay when they do in comparison to women, but you still have to explain why women do those things. In this study, it gave one possibility of gender roles and public pressure discouraging such things.
But yeah, I do actually acknowledge that there is a clear gap. From my post, I put quotation marks around the 'wage gap', quoting the ridiculous side, the mythical side. I'm not actually debunking the entirety of it as fake, but rather merely those ridiculous claims, such as the 77cents to 1 dollar thing, pinksourcing, etc. If you really could pay women less for doing the same work, pinksourcing would be commonplace. If you really could pay women just 77 cents on the dollar, companies would have ridiculously high incentives to hire more women. But we can still find, meet and greet male waiters, teachers and such!I think the evidence is quite clear that a pay gap is there.
When America was literally founded by Europeans and every white person in America has European ancestry.
kill me please
Didn't have much choice, if we're being honest. They were coming up anyways. I feel kinda sorry for them.Ok it's not so much Europeans as it is their globalist governments. They're fucked anyways though so it really doesn't matter. They dug their own grave when they started letting migrants in.
Correct to it not being systematic sexism - I agree with this anyway. However, social sexism is a thing as well. Living in a democratic country with a representative form of law and the 'wiggle rooms' in the workplace pay, social discrimination is important as well. I'd argue just as important.From the above, I understood that women are weak in the pay negotiating tycoon field because of gender roles and public pressure. Then it isn't systematical sexism in the markets. Instead, it's just social awkwardness, it's just societal pressure. It has nothing to do with legal laws and or bills allowing for less pay towards women. There is an earnings gap, but it isn't due to sexism, prejudice, the law, bills, legislations, etc.
If the study just gave the total, then you would be on to something. However, it breaks down the different occupations as well. You'll find that nearly all of them have women earning less, even when they outnumber men. The two exceptions I see are teaching assistant and counselor.View attachment 347660
Those 2016 women might actually see their median weekly earnings be higher if they had the same amount of workers as the 2016 men, and had said workers concentrated specifically more towards the risky jobs than not. Economists have long found that more dangerous jobs pay higher average wages than safer jobs. And the 20 jobs with the highest occupational fatality rates, tracked by the same Bureau of Labor Statistics, are on average 93% male. McDonalds cashiers doesn't earn more than electricians.
I've heard of this before, and I have two things I'd like to say:But every type of degree (associates, bachelors, masters, doctorate) favours females at the moment. Yet despite earning the majority of college degrees, as an example only 20% of engineering degrees are women. Graduate degrees are awarded to women almost 2/3rds of the time. Men, too, are in actuality doing less well in school these days. So women receiving less education quality or opportunities is, in turn, false.
Sure. I know there are people who think it's institutional, and if I didn't make it clear enough I don't agree with them. Personally I think it's unfair social pressures and how they relate to pay negotiations once in their occupation, and social pressures discouraging certain jobs. Hell, existence of a wage gap may not even be the fault of the employer. I don't really know enough about the social aspect of this stuff though, and that would mean shifting through quite a bit of data in all of the areas where male and female expectations vary. I think it's pretty obvious that gender expectations and roles exist, but I can't argue much into how far it reaches. However, one may argue the gap is instinctive. Honestly they're the only two possibilities I can fathom, as they're the only that's been presented to me: "It's natural" or "It's society." With the first, there's no sexism - it's just women being women. With the second, they're doing what they're doing because of the culture they're in. I'm bringing this up because pointing out that women take this instead of this doesn't mean anything unless you're also trying to figure out why that is. This is also partly why I'm against 'The wage gap is a myth,' because... well... it isn't, for one - It exists, but it's being dismissed in examples like this which causes others to not actually look into why it happens. I don't think I need to argue for the idea that knowing why it exists - regardless of whether it's instinct or culture - is important.But yeah, I do actually acknowledge that there is a clear gap. From my post, I put quotation marks around the 'wage gap', quoting the ridiculous side, the mythical side. I'm not actually debunking the entirety of it as fake, but rather merely those ridiculous claims, such as the 77cents to 1 dollar thing, pinksourcing, etc. If you really could pay women less for doing the same work, pinksourcing would be commonplace. If you really could pay women just 77 cents on the dollar, companies would have ridiculously high incentives to hire more women. But we can still find, meet and greet male waiters, teachers and such!
That gap is much smaller. Still there, but much smaller, and had decreased significantly for decades. To perpetuate all those myths is like beating a dead horse, as escalating them only serve to do more harm than good. 2016 was scary.