Futuristic (Social) OOC

[Lucem]

Pets are actually another character. So in a battle, the pet would get their own space with their stats. They get a turn and all too. Pretty much the only difference is that when they die, they don't come back. On a side note, this is why I said Part 2 will show love to OS Phantoms (sorry for Part 1 ). I'll be expanding on how they work. Akin to Pokemon, Phantoms will be able to "carry" up to 6 monsters. They can summon (bring out) or unsummon (take out) which they want for their 6. This is important because pets die when they are killed. I can go over it in more detail later, but keep that in mind.

How would turn order work then? I'm assuming a Phantom and their pet wouldn't be able to attack in succession.

 

[GasMaskie]

Glorious. I wanted to have a Persona-teemed kind of vibe for the RP, but decided against it. It really is beautiful and captivating though! The heck is that monster though in the back xD

It's the ultimate creature in virtual reality: the Gremblo.

 

[White Masquerade]

I dont know who invented lasagne toppers but i resent them.

Are they foreign? I don't think we have those in the US.

How would turn order work then? I'm assuming a Phantom and their pet wouldn't be able to attack in succession.

Maybe they would, maybe they won't. It depends on how the battle starts, how many people are involved and what the battlefield is.

It's the ultimate creature in virtual reality: the Gremblo.

Don't tempt me. You know I'll add it.

 

[Lucem]

It's the ultimate creature in virtual reality: the Gremblo.

He just wants to protect his family.

Maybe they would, maybe they won't. It depends on how the battle starts, how many people are involved and what the battlefield is.

I guess I'll wait and see then. My brain doesn't function very well when it comes to combat.

 

[GasMaskie]

Are they foreign? I don't think we have those in the US.


Maybe they would, maybe they won't. It depends on how the battle starts, how many people are involved and what the battlefield is.


Don't tempt me. You know I'll add it.

​

 

[The One Eyed Bandit]

Are they foreign? I don't think we have those in the US.

You might by a different name. It's just like, the top layer of a lasagna covered in bread crumbs and deep fried.

 

[QuirkyAngel]

Pets are actually another character. So in a battle, the pet would get their own space with their stats. They get a turn and all too. Pretty much the only difference is that when they die, they don't come back. On a side note, this is why I said Part 2 will show love to OS Phantoms (sorry for Part 1 ). I'll be expanding on how they work. Akin to Pokemon, Phantoms will be able to "carry" up to 6 monsters. They can summon (bring out) or unsummon (take out) which they want for their 6. This is important because pets die when they are killed. I can go over it in more detail later, but keep that in mind.


IMO debuff classes can still rock, they just need the money to do so. The social Media for example, if they get #Shutup level 3, the effect stays for 3 turns, and they can roll with it being active on their next chance. The poorer characters can't do this, but the richer characters can. I feel that is how it should be. You can be OP, but it will cost an arm and a leg.

Haha. It's cool. The main goal is for everyone to have fun- I'm just here to keep it civil, fair, and balanced. If you intend to make her a major character, I'll have to look at her CS and approve it and add the harvester myself. If she's more for color & background, I will allow her to just catch one out-of-scene. Just let me know which.

Why do you lie, White? =p #ShutUp doesn't increase the number of turns at level up. It increases the number of targets.

Staunna Shades does tho

...a bit of both? Originally I intended to just make her a just a background character. Hence why I let her catch a bunch of (lvl 1-2 ish) pets off screen. I don't imagine her as the type to train as much as collect/modify and study. Maybe just the elk as her highest =p But since I made her I wanna play with her. She's a support npc with stats after all...and while I didn't, and still don't really, intend to make her major( hence why skipping the harvester to more important scenes doesn't particularly bother me), I do want a her a touch involvement with game aspects...

*cough* So, I guess a small look? The same sort you'd give JinX. She's mostly background, but if I develop her IC, I want it to be a fair one. If she gets attacked (for whatever reason) she's not doing much but spamming Right of the Wild anyway given how little I've developed of her pets. =p

 

[GasMaskie]

Why do you lie, White? =p #ShutUp doesn't increase the number of turns at level up. It increases the number of targets.

Staunna Shades does tho

...a bit of both? Originally I intended to just make her a just a background character. Hence why I let her catch a bunch of (lvl 1-2 ish) pets off screen. I don't imagine her as the type to train as much as collect/modify and study. Maybe just the elk as her highest =p But since I made her I wanna play with her. She's a support npc with stats after all...and while I didn't, and still don't really, intend to make her major( hence why skipping the harvester to more important scenes doesn't particularly bother me), I do want a her a touch involvement with game aspects...

*cough* So, I guess a small look? The same sort you'd give JinX. She's mostly background, but if I develop her IC, I want it to be a fair one. If she gets attacked (for whatever reason) she's not doing much but spamming Right of the Wild anyway given how little I've developed of her pets. =p

Have her catch a gremblo.

 

[White Masquerade]

Why do you lie, White? =p #ShutUp doesn't increase the number of turns at level up. It increases the number of targets.

Staunna Shades does tho

...a bit of both? Originally I intended to just make her a just a background character. Hence why I let her catch a bunch of (lvl 1-2 ish) pets off screen. I don't imagine her as the type to train as much as collect/modify and study. Maybe just the elk as her highest =p But since I made her I wanna play with her. She's a support npc with stats after all...and while I didn't, and still don't really, intend to make her major( hence why skipping the harvester to more important scenes doesn't particularly bother me), I do want a her a touch involvement with game aspects...

*cough* So, I guess a small look? The same sort you'd give JinX. She's mostly background, but if I develop her IC, I want it to be a fair one. If she gets attacked (for whatever reason) she's not doing much but spamming Right of the Wild anyway given how little I've developed of her pets. =p

LMAO. I swear I know all the skills right? I don't even tab over to look at them haha. Then, I take that back.

In that case I'll take a look at her. Likely tomorrow I'll begin updating things.

simj26
Simbim, I'll give you your answer tomorrow and how you wrote such a great post. *hugs*

 

[White Masquerade]

He just wants to protect his family.



I guess I'll wait and see then. My brain doesn't function very well when it comes to combat.

That's surprising. I think you're being modest.

View attachment 714212​

Lol. So it's a meme. Thank you Gas. I will put gremblo on the list for creation.

You might by a different name. It's just like, the top layer of a lasagna covered in bread crumbs and deep fried.

Oooooh, that's the best part. What's wrong with you?? Do you even eat food?

 

[QuirkyAngel]

Have her catch a gremblo.

According to what White said about OS Phantoms, her maximum pokemon carrying capacity has been reached with the Harvester sadly (can't see her failing unless it's some sort of boss harvester=p).

 

[The One Eyed Bandit]

That's surprising. I think you're being modest.

he made gas and i build his characters for him

 

[Lucem]

That's surprising. I think you're being modest.

he made gas and i build his characters for him

 

[Chak]

QuirkyAngel
So obviously changed my plan for the post, but namely cause it's a more in character response for Sonata. Perhaps she'll be more Jensen-y in the future, no?

 

[QuirkyAngel]

QuirkyAngel
So obviously changed my plan for the post, but namely cause it's a more in character response for Sonata. Perhaps she'll be more Jensen-y in the future, no?

Haha, sure. But you should still roll the dices.

 

[Chak]

Haha, sure. But you should still roll the dices.

Mmm, yes, but I'm technologically inept and am unsure how to accomplish this.

 

[QuirkyAngel]

Mmm, yes, but I'm technologically inept and am unsure how to accomplish this.

Edit your post, there's a 'throw die' option, click it and put in your settings.

 

[Chak]

Edit your post, there's a 'throw die' option, click it and put in your settings.

Ah, I see. I presume a single d20 then?

 

[QuirkyAngel]

Ah, I see. I presume a single d20 then?

8 d24

At least, that's what i see on the character sheet.

 

[QuirkyAngel]

White won't let us take off our gear <.<

 

[Chak]

8 d24

At least, that's what i see on the character sheet.

Oh, yes, that's right. Each character has there own die based on stats. Sorry, quite used to the Pathfinder system.

 

[Chak]

22. Good thing my post ended with Sonata just up and saying hello.

 

[QuirkyAngel]

Yep. Our failure's inevitable anyway. Just roll with it the best we can^^

 

[Chak]

Yep. Our failure's inevitable anyway. Just roll with it the best we can^^

With any luck Sonata is either approachable enough to swing diplomacy, or tasty looking enough to get the two harvesters to chase after her.

 

[The One Eyed Bandit]

Just kill the tree dudes lol