Darth Bambi
Junior Member
Will post later this evening.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No rush.I have a post all lined up, but will wait a day or so before posting to give everyone a chance to reply.
I was not a fan of the spinning blade aspect of their lightsabers, it just didn't seem functionally practical or even really pheasible within the Lore as established so far [Legends and D-Canon], I agree with you on the flying inquisitors though. Dumb. But a lightring (AKA: hula-hoop-of-spinning-death) a very out there idea. And seems just as dangerous to the user, if not more so to the user, then the opponent. But I suppose with Force enhanced reflexes and spatial awareness and years of training it might be survivable.
I've always thought a light-axe would be a good choice.
The issue I see with that design, vs the idea of the Ice Axe style hilt, that has the darksaber esque blade that forms downward from the channeler is that the design you posted does the silliest thing you can think of with an axe.
This is what I was thinking of when I said light-axe. And aside from the ability to block/deflect blaster bolts, I feel like this could a much safe weapon to use for non-force sensitive wielder's and provide a certain level of intimidation/aggressive diplomacy for those Jedi/Sith who enjoy combat/physical prowess.
This style of weapon would also be a difficult weapon to duel against due to its non-traditional design.
The haft/hilt is where the weight could be to help with the appropriate balance and mindset on how the weapon should handle.
Now a slight variation on this design could be two (or four) short/shoto blades that cross at their midpoint, allowing for more slashing attacks and the ability to grab/hook other lightsabers or lightsaber resistant materials. You would still lack the ability to block blaster efficiently, but you still could.
Differences in blade length as well as the location of the blade in congruence with the location of your hand versus your holding style.I have trained with swords, longswords or what people call "bastard swords" as well with axes and war hammers and shields (I used to work for a medieval arms maker). Precision with any weapon in the battlefield is all about perspective and what your goals are. Also how well protected your opponent is. But with metal blades it's really about beating the other person with a metal stick or poking them with the pointy bit.
Now with the axe, whichever style of lightaxe we go with, even if the blade misses, you're still smacking someone with a metal stick. And the same can be said with a sword, now with a traditional lightsaber you can be even less precise since it's going to cut through almost everything and cause a fight ending wound in most people.
So it would stand to reason, from a certain point of view, that the lightaxe would require a higher level of skill to use. And to the blaster bolt blocking aspect, I think it could work well. If a guard shoto/tonfa or reverse grip lightsaber can deflect then why not an axe.
I like where your head is at with the shield idea.
I agree, a light axe would be a very offensive weapon. Which is probably why it would not be used by a Jedi.
I also think the mechanics of it, are the other reasons why it's not a thing. Just like the light-hula-hoop-of-death.
Both are fun, but not something that would come up in practical use. But if you want to bring in a LHHOD I will happily bring in a LA wielding partner for them. And we will blaze a glorious trail through everything!
Word. The tribulations of the soldier.Ah yes, deployments. Everyone's favorite thing in the world
Or sailor.
Who else is going to drink Iceland dry?
I think that's for the best. I know I wouldn't want to hold everyone up if I were unable to reply because military.