Futuristic At the Edge of the Apocalypse, an Eternal Principle

[Random Word]

Nope. That was perfect.

 

[Random Word]

@SephirothSage Angel is up.

 

[Sherwood]

Between the group, we should have enough power to wipe out the AT field of the angel and still have some points left over for defense.

 

[Bardiel]

At this stage, that seems likely. If we had been fighting the spawn and the Angel at the same time, that may not have been the case (depending on whether the Angel had to ultilise its' own AT Field for the spawn or not).

 

[SephirothSage]

Hey.


Thoughts on the Imagery with the Angel's so far?

 

[Bardiel]

I personally wouldn't mind a bit more: I keep imagining that the current Angel is something like Gaghiel, due to the battle being in the harbor area. This might be useful for giving some concept of the size of the Angels encountered and related matters.


B&W version, larger:


http://www.evacommentary.org/appendix/angel-size-comparison.jpg


Coloured version, smaller:


http://img11.deviantart.net/c6d4/i/2012/093/4/e/angels_of_evangelion__scale_by_mindmechanica-d4up2za.jpg


EDIT: Did not get notification that you posted there, @SephirothSage

 

[SephirothSage]

Also!


9 Damage to your body with a Pen of 3, @Napalm on Toast


And with the Tearing Quality, which I need to look up..

 

[Random Word]

@SephirothSage, were you going to edit the post about Natalia's shot to reflect the final result?


I think you're doing a fantastic job with your Angels, by the way.


Does the Angel's attack have Breach? Unit-03's AT Field isn't depleted, and if the Angel is depleted it doesn't get any auto-Breach. Also, ow, that's going to hurt. You might want to try to dodge or parry if you're any good at it, @Napalm on Toast. The Angel got a 12 with your -10, no idea how many DoS that is but you might be able to pull it off, especially with Fate Points.

 

[Bardiel]

To expand on my earlier comment, the battles have fun detail in them, but I meant a reminder of the Angel's name and description (perhaps on the start of a new round), since it can be tricky to try to find them after a few pages of posts have been made.

 

[SephirothSage]

Angel's attack has 3 Breach.


And its' Target's AT field is less due to being used to neutralize the Angel's own.

 

[Napalm on Toast]

Welp, I'll try to dodge again I suppose.


[dice]15891[/dice]


Ahaha, no saving that I suppose. So 4 damage to the torso? Owww.

 

[Random Word]

If you want, I can make that a 17 for you.

 

[SephirothSage]

Your call on spending limited resources...

 

[Random Word]

Mmhmm, just checking if it would even be useful. I don't know just how bad Napalm on Toast's Dodge is. Even with a 17 he might not be able to successfully dodge. He needs more DoS than the Angel, after all. How many did it get?

 

[SephirothSage]

Seven.

 

[Napalm on Toast]

Yeah I can't beat that. Go ahead and save it, random.

 

[Bardiel]

Since the last Angelspawn is defeated and assuming that Unit-01 is outside of effective range to engage the Angel proper, that should mean it is the start of a new round, right?


Roll for Initiative. Oh, another great roll...


[dice]16005[/dice]

 

[Random Word]

Oh, right. It's that time of combat again.


[dice]16006[/dice]

 

[SephirothSage]

I was actually going to say "Let's keep the same initiative order for the rest of the fight." ...

 

[Random Word]

But that's what I suggested last round and you said we weren't going to change it during this fight ( )

 

[SephirothSage]

I changed my mind so shhh.

 

[Random Word]

Okay, so @Sherwood and @DeusExAlice are up again, followed by a delaying @Napalm on Toast.

 

[Bardiel]

In that case, I'll repost this here:


Huginn (13, 4 Agi)


Natalia / Irene (13, 3 Agi)


Angel


Commandant (8)


Cassidy (4)


Final Spawn

 

[Random Word]

Final Spawn uses splatter. It's not very effective.

 

[Sherwood]

I'll have a post up in a little bit.