Cealen
★彡
hello there, checking in with my opinions!
this definitely seems to not be a big issue anymore, from what i have seen after coming back to rping after a long break, but i really hate when people want m/m pairings (sometimes even m/f and f/f!) to fall distinctly into “top” and “bottom” characters, even if it’s not sexual. apparently there is a way that “bottoms” always act like, and it’s always conveniently the stereotypical, heteronormative, gender role filled idea of what a “bottom” is.
for m/f i see this still sometimes, more leaning on the gender roles side of things rather than distinct “top” and “bottom”. even people trying to go against it (“oh my female characters are INDEPENDENT AND STRONG! they’re unique and actually have personalities!” still feeds into this idea that those aren’t “normal” female characters, and the “normal” way to write a female character is for them to be submissive...) .
but it used to be SO bad for m/m pairings. people really had this strange idea of what gay couples were like, i guess...but i dealt with it just because i really wanted to write lgbt+ couples since those characters i can relate to more...
it does seem like rping as a whole has improved A LOT in lgbt+ stuff. seeing people not do this anymore is really nice, honestly! also, seeing that i can actually have trans and non-binary characters in my rps now without having to explain why it’s “needed” (another rant for another time...) or getting the good old “oh i support gays but not transgenders” (ANOTHER another rant for another time...) makes me very happy. it really does feel like people don’t have this cartoonish idea of lgbt+ people anymore.
this definitely seems to not be a big issue anymore, from what i have seen after coming back to rping after a long break, but i really hate when people want m/m pairings (sometimes even m/f and f/f!) to fall distinctly into “top” and “bottom” characters, even if it’s not sexual. apparently there is a way that “bottoms” always act like, and it’s always conveniently the stereotypical, heteronormative, gender role filled idea of what a “bottom” is.
for m/f i see this still sometimes, more leaning on the gender roles side of things rather than distinct “top” and “bottom”. even people trying to go against it (“oh my female characters are INDEPENDENT AND STRONG! they’re unique and actually have personalities!” still feeds into this idea that those aren’t “normal” female characters, and the “normal” way to write a female character is for them to be submissive...) .
but it used to be SO bad for m/m pairings. people really had this strange idea of what gay couples were like, i guess...but i dealt with it just because i really wanted to write lgbt+ couples since those characters i can relate to more...
it does seem like rping as a whole has improved A LOT in lgbt+ stuff. seeing people not do this anymore is really nice, honestly! also, seeing that i can actually have trans and non-binary characters in my rps now without having to explain why it’s “needed” (another rant for another time...) or getting the good old “oh i support gays but not transgenders” (ANOTHER another rant for another time...) makes me very happy. it really does feel like people don’t have this cartoonish idea of lgbt+ people anymore.