Shireling
A Servant of King and Country
Work.
He who does not work does not eat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Work.
I'm a terrible person, because half the time I don't understand anything beyond the heterosexual/homosexual spectrum, but I do try.
I'm a terrible person, because half the time I don't understand anything beyond the heterosexual/homosexual spectrum, but I do try. I'm perfectly okay with anyone, so long as they're accepting of others as well. If not, then I get all mother hen on the situation. XD
Just expect a lot of questions due to my stupidity. ^^'
Lack of understanding doesn't make you dumb or a terrible person. Until this last year I wouldn't have known there was any such thing as like asexual and I only heard about demisexual/cisgenders, etc through roleplaying and asking people what they were talking about.
But then I'm from an older demographic where we didn't have all these terms growing up. Lack of knowledge is fine, wanting to learn is even better. As long as you don't invalidate someone else's opinions just because you don't understand them your fine.
3 hours ago, call me rae said:
To the best of my knowledge it isn't so much romance as a lack of sexual attraction. I could be wrong but as I understood the definition it isn't really anything to do with how you feel emotionally about other people, you just don't want to get physically intimate with them.
Now granted that would make a relationship difficult - as I imagine the lack of sexual content is difficult for people to wrap their heads around. But it doesn't make you some kind of social pariah incapable of relating to people emotionally.
Further romance isn't the only way we form close bonds with people. Nothing wrong with just having strong platonic bonds with people. I myself find romance to be intimidating from a social standpoint. The idea of going on dates or talking to strangers makes me anxious. But that doesn't mean I can't be friends with people or even theoretically that I couldn't be romantic. I just choose not to.
I don't feel any lack in my life because I'm not dating anyone. Nor do I think anyone with asexual / aromantic identity should feel a lack in their life socially just because they don't want to go on dates or be physically intimate with another person.
civility on the internet.
View attachment 237221
View attachment 237220
View attachment 237222
Here, have some internet things that explain asexuality, and a couple other less known sexualities in a simple easy to understand way.
But why though? Why the fuck does everything have to be a sexuality? What's wrong with just saying, oh, I'm not really attracted to people in a sexual way, or it takes me a bit longer to form a romantic bond with someone. Honestly, I think stuff like this just cheapens the concept of homosexuality and LGBT in general, as it makes it just seem like a bunch of angsty teens making up new words for their feelings.
Because it's easier to say "I'm ace/aro" than to have to try and explain to little that you don't find people to be sexually attractive at all.
The people that wouldn't get/understand you saying your not sexually attracted to people, are the same people that won't get what asexuality means. You're not saving any time. Also, why does sexuality have to be this defining thing about people? Like, what happened to being an interesting person with interesting hobbies? All I see now days is people exclusively describing themselves by their gender/sexuality.
The people that wouldn't get/understand you saying you're not sexually attracted to people, are the same people that won't get what asexuality means. You're not saving any time. Also, why does sexuality have to be this defining thing about people? Like, what happened to being an interesting person with interesting hobbies? All I see now days is people exclusively describing themselves by their gender/sexuality.
I'm honestly thinking about going asexual. Like why do I need to be with someone just to be validated by others, like okay..? I don't see a problem on going your own way. You're more self efficiency that way and you can also save so much money and truthfully, that's more attractive than becoming trapped in cyclical and constantly disappointing hookup culture.
1 minute ago, punkinblackk said:
@call me rae
Basically yeah.
@Icerex
I believe the extreme range of sexualities that are very similar but slightly different, has a lot to do with the millennials being a generation of "special snowflakes" where they are all taught how awesome and individual they are, and so forth (not getting into that) that find the need to have a very specific label that lets them feel entirely unique, but with the underlying "I need to feel that there are others like me" (something like that anyways) so therefore twenty labels where four or five broader terms would make a lot more sense.
(Seriously, how many terms are used by people over like... Twenty five ish?)
Just to illustrate my point.