Scattered Ambitions
4,000 club
3 minutes ago, Icerex said:
You're right. We aren't discriminated against. Asexuality has to be recognized as a sexuality before it can be discriminated against.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
3 minutes ago, Icerex said:
You're right. We aren't discriminated against. Asexuality has to be recognized as a sexuality before it can be discriminated against.
Um, what? That makes absolutely no logical sense. Please explain why your claim is correct.
I thought it was pretty self explanatory.
Do you not realize that homosexuals were persecuted way before being gay was considered a sexuality?
This is my first time actually hearing that? I mean I know about the persecution and all, but never really about that happening before being called a sexuality? I'm genuinely curious, not trying to argue, because I don't think asexuality's problems are rooted in discrimination.
me @ the title before even reading the thread
i know this is going to be an adventure i won't regret embarking on
This thread is about as dead as can be so
Considering it was probably necro'd when I found it, I didn't know that lol
it was still a fun (/s) adventure
EXACTLY people are oppressing them for what/who they aren’t doing ? it’s kind of funny but also extremely sad to think aboutI think its kinda nuts that THIS is what people are going crazy about
Asexuality fascinates me. See, up until very recently I was plainly convinced this whole "different sexualities" business was akin to the Mandela effect or some psychological sickness. Now I am more inclined to believe it more closely resembles a fetish. Whichever the case may be of course, it wouldn't make sense to judge someone for it.
That said, asexuality or aromantism are matters which seem a lot harder for me to put my finger on. I honestly wouldn't blame anyone who jumped to the idea that it is some kind of sickness, after all the person is missing a particular emotional response.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to say as a statement "being gay is a fetish", I do not have the tools to make such a sure statement, but rather that it is more similar to a fetish than anything else:Not to derail the thread, but what exactly do you mean by "being gay is a fetish?"
I've seen you say that before and it doesn't make much sense to me personally, as a bi person. To me it's more about who I love, the relationship aspect, etc and sex is never my main focus when it comes to who I would date/why I would date someone. It is for some people, but that applies to straight people as well.
snip
That last part would be incorrect. Being straight wouldn't be a fetish for the very simple reason that it is a natural biological function. You need to be attracted to the opposite gender for natural reproduction to occur by instinct hence the human body is naturally geared.Homosexual/gay/bisexual/heterosexual/etc refers to both romantic and sexual attraction. The split attraction model (if someone says they're a biromantic asexual for example) came from ace people who still want to date/fall in love with people. For the vast majority of people sexual and romantic attraction go hand-in-hand and influence each other, and therefore the majority of people have the same sexual/romantic attraction.
Fetishes are exclusively sexual and more about specific body parts/inanimate objects/etc and are considered abnormal to a degree. If being gay is a fetish by how you defined, then being straight would be too, but fetish doesn't seem like the right word in terms of definition and the connotations it carries.