Other What do you hate the most?

...Okay. That's your opinion, and you're entitled to it, I guess.

*Shrug* I care more about violence than I do ideology, if you think ideology is more important that's your choice. I did say we live in a country where it's acceptable to hold repugnant views after all.
 
Also, I'd like to point out that there are no "muh eviu nazis" in these riot, they're Neo-Nazis that in no way are associated to National Socialism and are simply there because they saw it on 4chan



Also, just pointing out another fact: National Socialism doesn't mean "be a jew hater hitler loving sieg heiling aryan., you can be a NatSoc without loving hitler.
 
I hate when I argue with citations and the response is just asserting against the claim. No citations or argument, just "Nah, that ain't true."
 
Wow, you really are a pretentious simpleton and a narcissist to boot. Textbook SJW scum.

Hey I've got question‽ Are you normally this blissfully unaware when people are heckling you? I feel like your perception of social issues might just be due to your apparent utter inability to detect this.

...also your ""meme"" has some interesting spellings, nerd. "Hetro" and "domanated" are interesting to say the least, and poor spelling is something that I hate just the most.
 
Last edited:
I hate the word Gender. Sex is the correct, scientific term. The word gender was invented by John Money, a crazy bastard who convinced the parents of twin boys to raise one of their sons as a girl after a botched circumcision, and then made David Reimer's, the son in question, twin brother fuck him in order to help solidify the fact that he was female in Reimer's mind. It was an utter failure, and Reimer would officially declare himself male and leave home at the age of 15. Years later, he would eventually reveal to the public what had happend to him, and would go on to commit suicide in 2004, due to severe depression, financial instability, and a troubled marriage.
 
Oh yeah. While I doubt I need to mention this, as my thoughts on the group is shown clearly in my mini rant about Milo Yiannopoulos, but fuck pedophiles. Fuck them with a bullet to the brain, because they are subhuman filth. You don't touch kids. Ever. Period. End of story. But apparently it isn't the end, cause now the kiddy fuckers want to be accepted by the LGBT community (and everyone else) as "Pedosexuals". Fuck that. I must give my whole hearted thanks to the LGBT community for telling those bastards to go take a pistol and end themselves in the fucking bathroom. No person who would touch a child like that deserves to live. And when I say child, I mean any human being under the age of 18. Cause that's a fucking kid. I don't care if you're only into post-pubescent teens or anything along those lines, cause that's still a bloody kid. Milo Yiannopoulos and people like him who support the idea of legalizing "pedosexuality" ought to be rounded up, hanged, and then have their corpses burned.


Okay, rant over.

Fuck pedophiles with a bullet to the head, cause that's the only kind of fuck they deserve.

Okay, NOW I'm done.
 
Oh are you heckling me now? I believe that's against the rules here.

But since you put it that way I can continue the meme campaign if you liked the last one so well.

I mean your post history is literally full of it and somehow you're still around here.

And what a bumper crop of inoffensive tosh. You're so boring. Ciao.
 
I hate the word Gender. Sex is the correct, scientific term. The word gender was invented by John Money, a crazy bastard who convinced the parents of twin boys to raise one of their sons as a girl after a botched circumcision, and then made David Reimer's, the son in question, twin brother fuck him in order to help solidify the fact that he was female in Reimer's mind. It was an utter failure, and Reimer would officially declare himself male and leave home at the age of 15. Years later, he would eventually reveal to the public what had happend to him, and would go on to commit suicide in 2004, due to severe depression, financial instability, and a troubled marriage.
He redefined the word. It was around before his theory but the distinction between it and sex then were just grammatical.
It was definitely a failure though, but just in case I'd like to point out that the testee declared himself male after being told what happened.
 
I hate the word Gender. Sex is the correct, scientific term. The word gender was invented by John Money, a crazy bastard who convinced the parents of twin boys to raise one of their sons as a girl after a botched circumcision, and then made David Reimer's, the son in question, twin brother fuck him in order to help solidify the fact that he was female in Reimer's mind. It was an utter failure, and Reimer would officially declare himself male and leave home at the age of 15. Years later, he would eventually reveal to the public what had happend to him, and would go on to commit suicide in 2004, due to severe depression, financial instability, and a troubled marriage.

He did not invent the word gender. The only term he coined himself was gender role in 1955.
He just tortured a child in the name of experimentation. The "study" didn't prove or disprove anything in regards to the gender spectrum; it just ruined a person's life.
A lot of transphobes will bring up this study without realizing that they're actually proving the opposite point. You can't force someone into a gender identity that they don't align with.
 
I mean, I hate the alt-right and left.

And to argue against the point of 'the right does less violence then left.' yeah, that might be true but they still have a violent ideology, Just because they aren't violent doesn't mean their beliefs aren't.
 
He did not invent the word gender. The only term he coined himself was gender role in 1955.
He just tortured a child in the name of experimentation. The "study" didn't prove or disprove anything in regards to the gender spectrum; it just ruined a person's life.
A lot of transphobes will bring up this study without realizing that they're actually proving the opposite point. You can't force someone into a gender identity that they don't align with.
I disagree with the study not saying anything, actually, but to start off:
So the reader is aware, the theory he was trying to provide evidence for was the idea that gender was entirely societal. Everything. That's why it was encouraged for the child to be raised as a girl, because if it worked then it would support the idea that every aspect of role in gender was from culture.

I'll also say that we don't know how the child was actually raised, so we don't know if it can be trusted; the parents weren't scientists, as far as I know. However, if they did treat their son like a girl then I think it still says interesting things about gender roles and gender identity.
I agree with the last paragraph though. That can really fuck someone up.
 
Oh yeah. While I doubt I need to mention this, as my thoughts on the group is shown clearly in my mini rant about Milo Yiannopoulos, but fuck pedophiles. Fuck them with a bullet to the brain, because they are subhuman filth. You don't touch kids. Ever. Period. End of story. But apparently it isn't the end, cause now the kiddy fuckers want to be accepted by the LGBT community (and everyone else) as "Pedosexuals". Fuck that. I must give my whole hearted thanks to the LGBT community for telling those bastards to go take a pistol and end themselves in the fucking bathroom. No person who would touch a child like that deserves to live. And when I say child, I mean any human being under the age of 18. Cause that's a fucking kid. I don't care if you're only into post-pubescent teens or anything along those lines, cause that's still a bloody kid. Milo Yiannopoulos and people like him who support the idea of legalizing "pedosexuality" ought to be rounded up, hanged, and then have their corpses burned.

Ok, I'm not sure where you're from. It says 'Rome,' but the age of consent is 14 (?) in Italy. I'm not sure if your profile has that as a joke, or if you're criticizing you're own country as well therefore.
And for those recoiling with 'Whaaaat?' at the mention of their age of consent, it's actually not that uncommon. The USA's 18 limit is more of a minority, even by its own states. Overwhelmingly the limit around the world seems to be '16,' with varying types of close-in-age laws; In canada, as an example of how a close-in-age law works, a 14 and 15 year old can consent to sex but only with someone older by four years or less. So five is a criminal offence and the same is for older than that. I also heard about how Japan's infamous '13' actually works. A 13 year old can't consent to sex if the person is over eighteen, but they can still consent to certain acts. I won't go into detail. But I digress on close-in-age laws.


And how 'child' is defined varies as well. It's legal definition is someone before the 'age of majority,' where they are legally considered capable of caring for themselves and therefore are no longer the responsibility of their parents. The exact age varies though, depending on culture.

So my point is really that while I understand hating pedophiles, I don't understand the rigor someone can have over their law system's specific age, especially since it's neither the majority or even the oldest used. By what standard is 18 when someone is no longer an adult, but Bahrain's 21 is going too far? Or, by what standard would Canada be advocating pedophilia for being below 18 but the US wouldn't for being below 21? This is why I agree with the puberty argument more, because it involves a less arbitrary foundation; pre-puberty you have no sex drive, so engaging in such activities without any desire for them on your own means you had to have been influenced - In other words, it's rape. Post sex-drive, it's possible for someone to consent to it.
Or one may argue that it should be based on the age of majority, when you are viewed as less dependent on others. Alright, but countries actually do vary between these ages and consent laws for one, and for another you have to consider what grounds should be used to justify when they are 'adults.'

I mean god damn, imagine if every country came on here to argue the same thing. "I can't believe they couldn't wait until she was 14, that disgusting pig" says Germany. "What monster couldn't wait until 16," says Britain. "Only a pervert lusts over those under 18," says the USA. "18? How dare you!" says South Korea. "You're all terrible," says Bahrain (who also has no close-in-age laws apparently.)

So I don't agree that it should be pedophilia unless it's with an 18 year old. You're not obligated to agree with the law, but if you want the moral limit to be 18 then the law should reflect that - And for both the law and morality you should have a clear foundation. Like, again, puberty (not JUST puberty, but this would be the main thing.) Of course, if there's something that you're using as justification that I'm merely unaware of, then I'm all ears. For the record though, I don't know what Milo argued for in that controversy. I'm neither agreeing or disagreeing with him, therefore.

Bahrain Age of Consent & Statutory Rape Laws
Age of Consent to Sexual Activity
Age of Consent & Sex Laws - AgeOfConsent.net
Ages of consent in Europe - Wikipedia
Ages of consent in North America - Wikipedia
Ages of consent in Asia - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Ok, I'm not sure where you're from. It says 'Rome,' but the age of consent is 14 (?) in Italy. I'm not sure if your profile has that as a joke, or if you're criticizing you're own country as well therefore.
And for those recoiling with 'Whaaaat?' at the mention of their age of consent, it's actually not that uncommon. The USA's 18 limit is more of a minority, even by its own states. Overwhelmingly the limit around the world seems to be '16,' with varying types of close-in-age laws; In canada, as an example of how a close-in-age law works, a 14 and 15 year old can consent to sex but only with someone older by four years or less. So five is a criminal offence and the same is for older than that. I also heard about how Japan's infamous '13' actually works. A 13 year old can't consent to sex if the person is over eighteen, but they can still consent to certain acts. I won't go into detail. But I digress on close-in-age laws.


And how 'child' is defined varies as well. It's legal definition is someone before the 'age of majority,' where they are legally considered capable of caring for themselves and therefore are no longer the responsibility of their parents. The exact age varies though, depending on culture.

So my point is really that while I understand hating pedophiles, I don't understand the rigor someone can have over their law system's specific age, especially since it's neither the majority or even the oldest used. By what standard is 18 when someone is no longer an adult, but Bahrain's 21 is going too far? Or, by what standard would Canada be advocating pedophilia for being below 18 but the US wouldn't for being below 21? This is why I agree with the puberty argument more, because it involves a less arbitrary foundation; pre-puberty you have no sex drive, so engaging in such activities without any desire for them on your own means you had to have been influenced - In other words, it's rape. Post sex-drive, it's possible for someone to consent to it.
Or one may argue that it should be based on the age of majority, when you are viewed as less dependent on others. Alright, but countries actually do vary between these ages and consent laws for one, and for another you have to consider what grounds should be used to justify when they are 'adults.'

I mean god damn, imagine if every country came on here to argue the same thing. "I can't believe they couldn't wait until she was 14, that disgusting pig" says Germany. "What monster couldn't wait until 16," says Britain. "Only a pervert lusts over those under 18," says the USA. "18? How dare you!" says South Korea. "You're all terrible," says Bahrain (who also has no close-in-age laws apparently.)

So I don't agree that it should be pedophilia unless it's with an 18 year old. You're not obligated to agree with the law, but if you want the moral limit to be 18 then the law should reflect that - And for both the law and morality you should have a clear foundation. Like, again, puberty (not JUST puberty, but this would be the main thing.) Of course, if there's something that you're using as justification that I'm merely unaware of, then I'm all ears. For the record though, I don't know what Milo argued for in that controversy. I'm neither agreeing or disagreeing with him, therefore.

Bahrain Age of Consent & Statutory Rape Laws
Age of Consent to Sexual Activity
Age of Consent & Sex Laws - AgeOfConsent.net
Ages of consent in Europe - Wikipedia
Ages of consent in North America - Wikipedia
Ages of consent in Asia - Wikipedia
Guess you're not a Fate fan, huh? It's supposed to be part of the joke.

Anyway, I understand where you're coming from. Different areas have different thoughts on the matter. But I personally believe that 18 hits that sweet spot of young enough that people are still a bit wide eyed about the world, but old enough to understand how it works anyway. And while yeah, not every country agrees, they can do what they want. It's their country. My point was "fuck pedophiles, and any other word they try to hide themselves behind", not "18 is the perfect age of consent". And while I personally think it's one of the better ages of consent, again, I'm not the leader of any of those countries that say the age of consent is 14, so it honestly doesn't matter what I think about it.

The only point I made that mattered was "Fuck Pedophiles and everything about them".

Also, Milo Yiannopoulos is a proponet of the idea that middle aged men should take a confused kid and "help" them, and admitted that the same happened to him. He also admited that he would willingly do it, and then went on to say that he was not a pedophile, as that is the sexual attraction to prepubescent children, and that he was only into post pubescent boys. Such as 13 year olds and higher. And while yes, in some other countries, it's perfectly legal to fuck a 14 year old, I personally disagree with the idea, because they just started the change to adulthood, and are very confused about how the hell the world and their body works. But, again, I'm not a German law maker, or a lawmaker anywhere else, so all it's just my opinion.
 
Guess you're not a Fate fan, huh? It's supposed to be part of the joke.

Anyway, I understand where you're coming from. Different areas have different thoughts on the matter. But I personally believe that 18 hits that sweet spot of young enough that people are still a bit wide eyed about the world, but old enough to understand how it works anyway. And while yeah, not every country agrees, they can do what they want. It's their country. My point was "fuck pedophiles, and any other word they try to hide themselves behind", not "18 is the perfect age of consent". And while I personally think it's one of the better ages of consent, again, I'm not the leader of any of those countries that say the age of consent is 14, so it honestly doesn't matter what I think about it.

The only point I made that mattered was "Fuck Pedophiles and everything about them".

Also, Milo Yiannopoulos is a proponet of the idea that middle aged men should take a confused kid and "help" them, and admitted that the same happened to him. He also admited that he would willingly do it, and then went on to say that he was not a pedophile, as that is the sexual attraction to prepubescent children, and that he was only into post pubescent boys. Such as 13 year olds and higher. And while yes, in some other countries, it's perfectly legal to fuck a 14 year old, I personally disagree with the idea, because they just started the change to adulthood, and are very confused about how the hell the world and their body works. But, again, I'm not a German law maker, or a lawmaker anywhere else, so all it's just my opinion.
Never heard of it. I tend to not be an anime fan though.

Ah, alright. I'd read it as suggesting that 18 should be a standard everywhere.
I understand the taboo over the whole thing, especially with a law allowing it as young as 14. I deleted a bit from the original post I was making because I thought it would make it a little too long, but another aspect of what I argue for and what is included in statutory laws is the idea of a 'sweet-spot' age where the person can be trusted to know enough about the risks and think for themselves. I was going to mention that culture, therefore, because that's one area it comes from. I should ALSO mention that the age varies depending on certain circumstances like a position of power or dependence, so no a teacher can't flirt with his/her high-school students here.

And yes, I finally saw some videos involving why Milo was accused of being a pedophile. Ho-ly shit, how the fuck does anyone defend that guy. I was originally of the conclusion that he was abused as a child, so mix that with the stupidity he's already able to show and you get some pretty weird things. Well... no. As if someone needing to explain to him why statutory laws exist wasn't bad enough (in the same example, he accused the guy of not knowing what pedophilia was and gave an incorrect definition,) he tried to appeal to Joe Rogan with "Haven't you ever thought a fifteen-year-old was hot while you're thirty?" and, yeah, that whole thing about how it helps gay people. Then talking about how he'd gone to a party in hollywood within eight years, seeing men having sex with 'very young' boys. Maybe people will start to realize that the only reason he actually became popular was because he is a gay person who dislikes feminism... something he himself has agreed with.
 
Reviving the thread,

I hate the fact that it's impossible to share an opinion without someone saying "but you're the only one thinking that", the internet is a very vast place, who says I'm the only one?

and people who hate someone based on their country, and generalizing everyone, just because you meet jerks, doesn't mean everyone looks alike.

ah and, people who are really rude to people who do not speak "English perfectly" without even knowing why, instead of shouting, you have to teach in peace.

and wanting to get involved in other people's lives without realizing how unhealthy it can be.

And of course, suicidal pity, basically, if you don't give someone attention, then, they'll going to end their lives,

People who act like they know better than you, and make you feel like you are wrong on everything,

The society itself when you must be exactly what everyone want you to be.

This is more a Facebook and Instagram thing: impersonnating someone (mostly a youtuber) to sell products they don't own at all, and people are dumb enough to fall for it, like.. is it hard to notice the "verified" logo near the real user?
 
Last edited:
-People that are not willing to see any other opinion other than their own.

-People that air private issues publicly to garner sympathy online.

-People that look to other people to tell them what they want to hear about how great they are.
 
People that whine about no one interacting with them so instead of reaching out they want to be a troll.
 
Well, I have a long list of things, I hate... No, no, I'm kidding! Okay, so here's my list.

1. People who lie to me
2. People who are egotistical
3. People who use me, only when it benefits them (I'm quick to cut that man off, so get comfortable!)
4. People who brag about their cosplays and show off the backsides, more than their "best craftsmanship" online, in the cosplay community. (One reason why, I don't consider myself a part of the cosplay "community" because of all the toxicity it has. And that has risen up, over the years.)
5. People who think that by saying I get annoyed by some lewd cosplayers, that I hate ALL people who cosplay lewds. It's NOT that, it just gets old seeing that fanservice and I'm the type to unfollow, if that's all they show.
6. People who complain about being "misunderstood", when they have romantic partners. I feel like that's the most irritating thing...
7. People who BOAST about their romantic partners, all the time, (beyond Valentine's Day) online. I've unfollowed and blocked so many people, because of this.
8. Elitists in the anime, otaku, weeaboo, K-Pop, J-Pop and cosplay "communities" who always have a complaint about something in one of the aforementioned hobbies (or passions); think they're always right. And act like if you disagree with them, you're "uneducated".
9. Worst of all! Anime elitists who are older, who think they know everything and that otakus my age, are "too young" to know or understand classics outside of Sailor Moon and Dragon Ball... I could rant about that one, for days!

Because, there's this thing called the Internet and that's where I first saw the 1990's films for Devilman and discovered Captain Harlock... And oy vay! It's just ridiculous... So, yea, before I start getting truly enraged; I'm just going to stop here. Those are the things, I hate more than anything. Other than my ex, lol! Just kidding. The only thing I hate more than those things, is anyone who dares to make my mom cry! Or hurt my family... If that line is crossed, my death note has a blank space for you. But I love my family. So, yea, to each their own.
 
When I'm trying to get some sleep and my pillow heats up, so I have to keep flipping it over until I'm asleep.
 
Fandom role-playing.
I feel like you can never really get in the head deep enough of a character that is not yours
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top