Men vs Women (Race to 1000)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was a, uh, how do I say this, and make it even more obvious? A joke. I went to high school. I know what that is. Obviously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Either way, being disrespectful doesn't get you anywhere in an argument, or in life.


I'd recommend watching your tone when dealing with other people, especially in something as casual as this.
 
404. And I'm highly invested in it. I sat here for many hours, with nothing better to do, bringing the number down from 618 to 404. I know, I'm pretty cool. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
405.


Obviously you're invested enough in it. You got into what you perceived as an argument over a counting game.


That takes a level of investment.
 
404. It was mostly just confusing the entire time around for everybody. And yeah, like I said, I'm pretty nonsensically invested. But that was totally an argument. I didn't conjure that out of nothing. I don't get a kick out of "scamming" somebody out of a few imaginary numbers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
405.


That wasn't an argument. As you described ("It was mostly just confusing the entire time around for everybody."), you were confused.


As someone who is so invested in imaginary numbers, I wouldn't put it past you to get a kick out of that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nonagon said:
405.
That wasn't an argument. As you described ("It was mostly just confusing the entire time around for everybody."), you were confused.
Click to expand...
I was confused? Yeah. As we're you. Wildly. Miscounting on nearly every single post doesn't quite give you credibility here. I know. You didn't refresh the page often enough. That's what caused the confusion, though. I'm not really sure what you take me for if you think I get a kick out of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not asking for credibility. So. Sure? If you want to think so. I was also the one getting us back on track, if you recall.


405
 
404. No, that was you refusing to stop touting your incorrect number until I decided it wasn't worth continuing your argument. Seems to be that you're the more invested one, or the most obnoxious at the very least. Quite an achievement with me here, I'm sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The number I used wasn't incorrect. If you went back and counted, you'd see. But your track record isn't good for reading, lol.


And back to ad hominem with 'you're... the most obnoxious'. That's not reflecting badly on me, you should realize.


405
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The number actually wasnt right. You were just being stubborn, meaning the ad homenim attack was relevant in this case. Saying its obnoxious to prolong the argument without admitting any wrongs shows that your argument might have bigger flaws that you arent admitting. Alright, let's both just fuck off about the fake numbers and how we didn't refresh fast enough. We both did some small incorrect stuff that combined into a bigger difference. 404.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd go back and quote every single post and break it down for you, but as I said, I'm not that invested in a forum game, or in you.


405.
 
404. I could easily piece together a sequence of events with the posts that supports me. Or, at least, the originals, before you edited them. Nice belittling tactics. Or didn't you read my last post?
 
404. Coming from the person who edited just as many posts after posting them. This is what I'm saying. We've both done small incorrect things that add up and create wildly different point of view of the sequence of events.
 
I'm not saying editing is wrong. It's a useful tool. What I'm saying is that you can't expect me to go back to all your previous posts and check to see if you've added another couple sentences or deleted something. 405.
 
404. I just explained why it's ironic of you to criticize me for doing that. And didn't edit it. I'm just saying that we both need to fuck off quite a few levels.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not criticizing you for editing that post, which you did. I'm only pointing out that, as with the numbers, I'm not going to refresh to check for your edits on old posts.


405.
 
I'm not saying that first one I edited wasnt edited. I'm saying the one where I made the point about how irrelevant that critique was hadn't been edited. And as I said. I could easily make a case for myself. Which I did multiple times before deciding that it was pointless to keep trying to yell over one another. Neither of us are going to accept the other is correct on ANY fronts. Except when I just did, multiple times in a roe while you kept ranting. but that doesn't matter. Right? I'm saying this argument is pointless. 404.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Similar threads

Idea
Halloween Game: Trick or Treat the Avatar Above
Replies
2
Views
23
Idea
Idea
Back
Top