Re: Anathema
I can do the same with Ed's. Pop by his forum, make a suggestion, and then I am done. I was sloppy with my word choice. Anathema does not seem of any MORE (or less, really) use to me than Ed's. As ashen's presented it, the only advantage it has over Ed's is that anybody who knows how to use . . . . java, was it? . . . whatever you all use for it to make it do what you want without having to go to someone else.UrsKR said:If you are missing a feature, just drop me a note. Things take time, of course, but I'll at least make certain to get back to you once we handled your request.
If I've got him right, he's using it as a selling point for Anathema. It being open (or whatever the right term that means anyone can tinker with the code) means that the project is not just reliant on a single individual to do the coding, and therefore, Anathema will advance far faster than any other utility available.UrsKR said:ashenphoenix:
Way up in the thread, you spoke about democracy. I'm not sure if I got you right, are you concerned about a lack of democracy in the Anathema development process?
Regards
-Urs, Anathema Public Relations Guy