Assuming you make Chejop Kejak a bad guy:
Myself, I dont think so. Â I think good ol'e Ketchup is actually MORE intimidating as a behind the scenes, ruthless, plotter than as a bad ass martial artist. Â I would make him a peerless astrologer (and interestingly, possibly the Sidereal under the biggest stain of the curse), a peerless Beurocrat, but a fighter? Â Naah. Â If I were running a Sidereal game, I would play up the ruthlessness from which he could casually sacrifice entire nation of people, up to his enemies. Â I would play up and villainize him by making be someone who turns to sacrificing people as a leader way way too easy. Â I would make him into a peerless machiavellian leader who not only inspires fanaticism (not blind, but reasoned and unquestioned loyalty) in his followers, but also one who wins over his enemies through sheer strategy. Â You know, this is the guy who casually gets victories, but is not a tactical genius. Â He gets them through unconventional means. Â He wins over followers through guile, deceit, treachery, diplomacy, wars of attrition, trade, but never force. I would make him an evil Lord Vetinari, if you will. Â Or a mcuh better done Darth Sidious.
You know where the climax of the series is not physically or magically beating the guy down, its actually getting to the point where he can be beat down. Â Where actually beating the guy down consists of having his legions actually realize how evil he was. Â
Incidentally it would seem that if you are spending all  your time plotting the course of the world, that your martial skills would suffer.  After all, generals of armies arent generally known for their combat skills, more for their planning skills.  They may have been great hand to hand comabatants in their youth, but nothing compared to a guy who spends the same amount of time doing nothing but butt whoopin'.
Thoughts?
Myself, I dont think so. Â I think good ol'e Ketchup is actually MORE intimidating as a behind the scenes, ruthless, plotter than as a bad ass martial artist. Â I would make him a peerless astrologer (and interestingly, possibly the Sidereal under the biggest stain of the curse), a peerless Beurocrat, but a fighter? Â Naah. Â If I were running a Sidereal game, I would play up the ruthlessness from which he could casually sacrifice entire nation of people, up to his enemies. Â I would play up and villainize him by making be someone who turns to sacrificing people as a leader way way too easy. Â I would make him into a peerless machiavellian leader who not only inspires fanaticism (not blind, but reasoned and unquestioned loyalty) in his followers, but also one who wins over his enemies through sheer strategy. Â You know, this is the guy who casually gets victories, but is not a tactical genius. Â He gets them through unconventional means. Â He wins over followers through guile, deceit, treachery, diplomacy, wars of attrition, trade, but never force. I would make him an evil Lord Vetinari, if you will. Â Or a mcuh better done Darth Sidious.
You know where the climax of the series is not physically or magically beating the guy down, its actually getting to the point where he can be beat down. Â Where actually beating the guy down consists of having his legions actually realize how evil he was. Â
Incidentally it would seem that if you are spending all  your time plotting the course of the world, that your martial skills would suffer.  After all, generals of armies arent generally known for their combat skills, more for their planning skills.  They may have been great hand to hand comabatants in their youth, but nothing compared to a guy who spends the same amount of time doing nothing but butt whoopin'.
Thoughts?