Idea
The Pun Tyrant
hm?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
hm?
Thought your post was really good.
Ah thank you. To be honest I may have gotten a little hotheaded by the end, and sassy by te beginning. A little tired of debunking the same arguments over and over again.Thought your post was really good.
I understand. I feel the same when I see people commenting on areas of history I work with. I'm not as skilled in christanity history to defend it.Ah thank you. To be honest I may have gotten a little hotheaded by the end, and sassy by te beginning. A little tired of debunking the same arguments over and over again.
Well, I'm not exactly a historian or expert either, as I pointed out in my response there. And my point when I said it is simply that you don't need to dedicate your life to understand the things I said. To put it in a perhaps banal language, one simply needs to actually give a fuck. Which is something I find unfortunately a lot of people on all sides of the argument don't. Nobody is completely exempt from fault here. But I just because there is someone on a side that is an idiot does not justify the downputting of beliefs or of the credibility of people who hold those beliefs.I understand. I feel the same when I see people commenting on areas of history I work with. I'm not as skilled in christanity history to defend it.
Because I hate Christianity with all my heart for the shit it has brought to my life.
Y'know, being rrrr---- let's not talk about that
Non-Denominational thinks differently butSo, wait, you disdain something because you were involved in it? AKA you disdain yourself or are you just admiting you're fundamentlaly biased?
Oh yes the good old arguments that show complete ignorance regarding what is ACTUALLY BELIEVED by people of faith. At least as far as we catholics go, I can't speak for protestants because those are more for an individual style of belief rather than a unified one.
It's called time and history. The things you call "not being a dick" today were in fact majorly implemented BY christanity. It's influence shifted many cultural norms and was at the base of many later philosophies not to mention providing the education necessary for actual cultural progress. And while the past deeds of something don't really apply to the value of it's descendants much, it does show just how much work was needed for what you think is "common sense" today.
As for the contradictions 99.999% of them are only contradictions when you know nothing about the bible. You'd think people claiming to be more intelligent would be mentally capable of realizing that maybe the average chirtstian doesn't actually believe in a talking snake but understands the bible is obviously a 2000 year old book written in the poetry-centric style of the time, but I guess that's too much to ask.
To give an example, that God can't be those threethings idea. Well, such a being would want the best possible result. The best possible result is one of order but freedom. So while God could interviene , doing so would leave us WORSE than the current situation.
In the first place, why do you oh mighty, think that you can tell that the world is any worse than it could be? By the laws of causality, everything in this universe is connected. Yet if I asked you what's gonna happen tomorrow you wouldn't be able to tell me. So how do you expect to understand the actions and choices of a being like God? What gives you the right to claim a contradiction in which you are forgetting virtually every variable?
All of these are a matter of what I just explained. Free will. Humans are given free will because their happiness would be meaningless without it. And as such, God intervienes very little. What ,meaning would have a miracle if it was an everyday occurrence? None. But if God revealed Himself in all His might, there would be no choice, it would be too overwhelming. You can think of it like tickling. It's not that it can't happen, or that you can't laugh without being tickled, but if you are tickled, you WILL laugh. Like it or not. Likewise belief is something that is better when done by choice, happiness is only menaingful if it comes by choice.
Second, Hell and Heaven are also choices. God doesn't send you to either, he invites you to Heaven, but the blindness of sin and corruption can make you yet reject God. And from the moment the choice is made, you are in eternity. Which is often mistaken with forever. But that is very wrong. It does not mena forever, it means an absence of time. It is as much as thousand years as it is a second.
Again, this is Catholic belief. I didn't even delve into the really complicated stuff. In fact, these are things I know by being interested , I didn't even need the required education of priesthood to understand this much.
First of all this "over 1000 animals species" is blown way out of proportion and is 9/10 plain untrue. The studies that claim it are extremely faulty and unscientific, many misunderstand breeding mistakes such as the case of "gay penguins" with actually being attracted to the same gender and we can't just ignore that genetical errors are a thing. Furthermore, even if this wasn't true 1000 species is a hair thread compared to the wig shop that is the animal kingdom with billions of species being known and more being found all the time.
this isn't to say gays don't have rights but this whole idea that it is somehow normal in nature is , as you put it, bullshit. what is it exactly? To be honest, it puzzles me too. it can't be genetic otherwise there wouldn't be so many, and it's not clearly a choice or a psychological issue. The traits of it reassemble more of a kink if you ask me and again it's ok to be in a gay relationship. It's ok to get one fo those government "marriages". But it does go agains the fundmanetals of both biological reproduction and christian marriage, so yeah we don't want gays married in our searches. We don't have anythign them in person, but you don't need to have anything against a kid to not want them spitting on the guest food. It's the behavior in context that is the problem, not any of it separated.
Again, this goes back to how the Bible was written. You don't have to believe in those things to be a christian mainly because there is one group of chrisitans in total that takes the bible literally. I believe their name was fundamentalists or somethign like that. And they are, for obvious reasons, very easy to make fun of. And to criticize. But your average tomato quality shoudl not be the tomato rotting on the shelves in the corner because someone left it there by accident. It should either be taken from the actual middle or from a careful consideration of all the elements. And that's being generous. You cannot attack a belief unless you can debunk it's most well-constructed and intelligent arguments and people.
In the end of the day, many claim to debunk christianity without even knowing what it ACTUALLY says. Without bothering to give it a second of thought or go for anything esle than low-hanging fruit. You claim my beliefs and those of billions who knows if more than have been and passed away were all bullshit, yet you inflate your egos just because you can swim in the kiddie pool now while we are watching from the ocean. There are many inteliigent and well-versed atheists I know and can respect, but the behavior you have shown here is downright bottom of the barrel. I suggest you do some research and actually think about these things carefully next time.
I'm sorry, could you clarify what you said?Non-Denominational thinks differently but
Points still stand that all of the points OP made are at best out of context and at worst wrong.
Yes I am making that without backing that up because I don't want to actually deal with an in-depth analysis that will be batted around for two days before being purged from the internet.
You and I believe things differentlyI'm sorry, could you clarify what you said?
Ah alright. yeah, there tend to be differences in belief. Not sure which version of christianity you susbcribe to, though.You and I believe things differently
But
We agree that the OP's points were poor.
_____________________________
[For any possible response]
Well, there are many branches in science too and you know, in basically every form of knowledgeWhat really killed Christianity for me is that 1. There's a ton of branches. How valid can a belief be if someone can just come along and say I'm not catholic because you worship saints or vice versa?
Well, it's not supposed to be an anatomical description of the angelic being it's supposed to be a description of the intensity of the relevation via imagery. I can't there is nobody that believes in some old man in the sky making stone tablets, mainly children do, but I can say that such ideas are neither at the center nor actually accepted by the vast majority of people of faifth, they are merely protrayed as if they were for the same reason a lot of other groups are misrepresented, it gets better ratings.Second, is that Ezekiel's account of angels is amazing. It's like reading a really good fantasy book. I just can't take that seriously when it looks more like a page out of evangelion(the anime). A disfigured man like giant of flame and shining jewels.
Dunno why you mentioned me but okayHige in general I'm not against religion. All you have to do is look back at soviet Russia or nazi Germany to see that a lack of religion, doesn't lead to a more peaceful world.
My problem with religion is the same I have with Islam. When religion is tied to the government and values which are incompatible with personal freedoms become law, you can end up with the oppressive state of the current Islamic faith. Or in your case, the Catholic Church that held dominion over Europe for hundreds of years after the fall of Rome.
Now here's my thing. Religion when it's defanged, like current Christianity. Gives meaning to people's lives in a way that being rational and knowing you're going to just die and rot in the ground. There's something special about the super natural, myth and legend that affects people's lives in a big way. Most of my tolerant attitudes in life came from the unquestionable tenants of thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not steal. Even as someone who isn't devout anymore, I still see the usefulness of said values.
What really killed Christianity for me is that 1. There's a ton of branches. How valid can a belief be if someone can just come along and say I'm not catholic because you worship saints or vice versa?
Second, is that Ezekiel's account of angels is amazing. It's like reading a really good fantasy book. I just can't take that seriously when it looks more like a page out of evangelion(the anime). A disfigured man like giant of flame and shining jewels.
Doesn't help me become more devout.
Now I will say this, with all that being said. My main point is you shouldn't hate religion. It's advisable that you don't. Because secular values don't always lead to a better world. And more importantly, religion gives life a great deal of meaning. I wish that I could believe in heaven so that I could see my dead family members again. Even if it won't happen, that security means a lot to people.
Because you hate Christianity.Dunno why you mentioned me but okay
No?Because you hate Christianity.
oops my bad, xD I was on the train and connected that comment to the op.No?
I don't? Why are you putting words in my mouth?
Ahh, that's okay. Don't forget the OP hates Islam too and bases their opinion on the few extremes terrorists that happen to follow the same religion.oops my bad, xD I was on the train and connected that comment to the op.
Different branches of religion are different branches of belief, not different branches of fact.Well, there are many branches in science too and you know, in basically every form of knowledge
What's to stop me from saying I believe there are 3 gods? No one would be able to refute that because it's belief. I am arguing based on the notion that if you can conjure up a belief that is alien to a religion, then how valid is the system of belief as a whole?It simply comes from people being human and having limited knowledge and awareness. People will tell you are wrong because they believe you are since they believe they are right. Is this the case? Maybe or maybe not, it's up to your own judgment to try and understand which is the truth. Just because someone disagrees that doesn't make a belief more or less valid.
It doesn't matter what the majority may or may not believe. This is coming from the bible, the historical account of events related to the religion. It's just as silly as saying we have a spiritual part of ourselves that transcends our finite bodies(soul) or that there's an eternal lake of fire(hell).Well, it's not supposed to be an anatomical description of the angelic being it's supposed to be a description of the intensity of the relevation via imagery. I can't there is nobody that believes in some old man in the sky making stone tablets, mainly children do, but I can say that such ideas are neither at the center nor actually accepted by the vast majority of people of faifth, they are merely protrayed as if they were for the same reason a lot of other groups are misrepresented, it gets better ratings.
You didn't clarify anything. xDJust to clarify I am not trying to attack your point, in fact your idea about a "defanged" religion intrigues me as I nver thought of the problem that way before, but I do want to try to clarify some of the concerns you seem to have regarding religion
NON-DENOMINATIONALAh alright. yeah, there tend to be differences in belief. Not sure which version of christianity you susbcribe to, though.
I ain't hating on religious people
The religions I disdain the most are two:
- Christianity - the one I was involved into.
- Islam - the one where terrorists supposedly come from
Compared to what was prominent at the time (such as paganism), Christianity (technically speaking Judaism honestly) was quite unique compared to some other religions of the time. For example, monotheism or say, loving one's enemy, among some other examples found in the old testament (BC) However, as some others have pointed out, Judaism and Christianity are not unique in its urge for peace, however, it did provide a separate way of leaving for others who wanted to live it. Yes, I do believe that you can be an atheist or agnostic and still be a nice and warm person. I also genuinely believe that, however Christianity (especially organized worship) regularly instills these values as a reminder or to make you reflect on, say, what you've done the past week or so.The Bible - Seriously? Who needs a thousand metaphors to figure out you shouldn't be a dick? (Thanks, Bo Burnham). And let's not talk about the contradictions! God is supposedly an omnipotent being that knows what was, what is, and what will.
Adam And Eve - THEN WHY IN THE FUCK did our dear All-Father (do you guys call him that? Or is that Odin from the Nordic Mythology?) put the Tree of Knowledge if he ALREADY KNEW IN ADVANCE that Adam AndStEve would commit sin and eat the apple off of it?
Right... Like insulting the other side already isn't hating.I ain't hating on religious people
Lucifer - Omnipotent beings don't make mistakes. THey're just not able to. Unless they want to. And so, why the fuck was Lucifer (or Samael, if you're that nit-picky) psychologically able to rebel? How did God create him knowing his mindset would make him rebel? He must've created Lucifer with the intent of him rebelling.
Hell - No matter how much you rape, kill, or destroy in life -- no temporary crime or sin deserves PERMANENT punishment in the form of torment. To allow this to happen and be capable of stopping it is to be evil. According to this large book I have on my shelf called, and I quote "The Old Testament", Hell is eternal. Eternal punishment means Permanent punishment. Temporary crimes do not amount to permanent punishment. It is an injustice. And injustice, by strict definition, is evil. And don't go around saying that Satan rules hell because that's not true mate. Satan is simply the warden. Our friend God is the maker and rule-giver!
Homosexuality - Yeah, I'm looking at you, you gay-haters. Homosexuality is found in over 1000 animal species. Wanna know what is NOT found in animals? Chastity. That's right. Priests and Nuns do something against nature, and thus against God's will! Why would God create something that he doesn't approve of? He is either not omnipotent and that caused a mistake...or he is evil and wanted gays to suffer by putting them on Earth, pointing his finger at them and saying to every religious person that they're bad because they like people of their own biological sex.
Old Testament vs New Testament - In the Old Testament, God killed over 10 million people. In the New Testament, he's an all-loving entity that forgives all. He forgives all? Yeah, right. Explain Hell, purgatory, and the fact that he wasn't so all-loving before. The Flood. Remember that? Exactly. He was angry at people because they were using their own free will to do stuff he didn't want them to do (mind stopped working? Yep! Mine did. Had to reboot it a couple of times). (Psst, Satan killed no more than 15 people in the Bible).