• This section is for roleplays only.
    ALL interest checks/recruiting threads must go in the Recruit Here section.

    Please remember to credit artists when using works not your own.

Nation Building 2028 A World of Strife (Modern)

JB5899 said:
We will gladly add your numbers but expect heavy economic recessions...
A couple hundred more won't hurt right? I don't see why maybe...2500 tanks would affect my economy greatly
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bobisdead123 said:
did u count the equipment I stole from Pakistan?
Yes but you've been at war since you've begun playing you've lost a good amount of the equipment you got from them.
 
Serenade said:
A couple hundred more won't hurt right? I don't see why maybe...2500 tanks would affect my economy greatly
No it will because you've done little in the way of economic reforms and building a few new businesses and letting foreign businesses use you for cheap labor won't allow you to support the largest tank force in Europe.
 
Bobisdead123 said:
ISIS idk
Im invading Afghanistan, they gotta have some. Otherwise ill buy stuff from India
Well with the massive arty attacks most you'll find is some scrap.
 
JB5899 said:
Well with the massive arty attacks most you'll find is some scrap.
I wont be using as much Arty against the Aghanistan people, can't justify that much collateral damage against them
 
Bobisdead123 said:
I wont be using as much Arty against the Aghanistan people, can't justify that much collateral damage against them
Okay just remember that when going up against different nations that it doesn't matter what kind of equipment you have but the quality of your troops.
 
JB5899 said:
Okay just remember that when going up against different nations that it doesn't matter what kind of equipment you have but the quality of your troops.
Equipment maters, but troops can make up for equipment


I don't expect the Afghanistani Army to be better at all than mine. Plus ill have Indian support
 
Oh boy the big scary Afghanistani army!


Afghanistan


PwrIndx: 2.5761


102


icon-soldiers.gif
MANPOWER


Going beyond military equipment totals and perceived fighting strength is the actual manpower that drives a given military. Wars of attrition favor those with more.


Total Population: 31,822,848


Available Manpower: 13,709,758


Fit for Service: 7,847,309


Reaching Military Age Annually: 762,411


Active Frontline Personnel: 200,000


Active Reserve Personnel: 0


icon-army.gif
LAND SYSTEMS


Tank value includes Main Battle Tanks, light tanks and tank destroyers, either wheeled or tracked. AFV value includes Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) and Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs).


Tanks: 700


Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFVs): 9,669


Self-Propelled Guns (SPGs): 0


Towed-Artillery: 226


Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRSs): 50


icon-aircraft.gif
AIR POWER


Includes both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft from all branches of service.


Total Aircraft: 164


Fighters/Interceptors: 0


Fixed-Wing Attack Aircraft: 2


Transport Aircraft: 149


Trainer Aircraft: 6


Helicopters: 123


Attack Helicopters: 7
 
Bobisdead123 said:
Oh boy the big scary Afghanistani army!
Afghanistan


PwrIndx: 2.5761


102


icon-soldiers.gif
MANPOWER


Going beyond military equipment totals and perceived fighting strength is the actual manpower that drives a given military. Wars of attrition favor those with more.


Total Population: 31,822,848


Available Manpower: 13,709,758


Fit for Service: 7,847,309


Reaching Military Age Annually: 762,411


Active Frontline Personnel: 200,000


Active Reserve Personnel: 0


icon-army.gif
LAND SYSTEMS


Tank value includes Main Battle Tanks, light tanks and tank destroyers, either wheeled or tracked. AFV value includes Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) and Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs).


Tanks: 700


Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFVs): 9,669


Self-Propelled Guns (SPGs): 0


Towed-Artillery: 226


Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRSs): 50


icon-aircraft.gif
AIR POWER


Includes both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft from all branches of service.


Total Aircraft: 164


Fighters/Interceptors: 0


Fixed-Wing Attack Aircraft: 2


Transport Aircraft: 149


Trainer Aircraft: 6


Helicopters: 123


Attack Helicopters: 7
I was never questioning how you would fair against the Afghans I'm talking about any future conflicts after your done dealing with Middle Eastern rabble.
 
JB5899 said:
I was never questioning how you would fair against the Afghans I'm talking about any future conflicts after your done dealing with Middle Eastern rabble.
who else do I want to fight :P


just the middle eats tbh
 
Im invading Afghanistan, they gotta have some. Otherwise ill buy stuff from India
I would be careful, no nation has ever succesfullly invaded afghanistan, they are the russia of the middle east.


And if the USSR couldn't do it, I doubt you could.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AdmiralKerkov said:
I would be careful, no nation has ever succesfullly invaded afghanistan, they are the russia of the middle east.
And if the USSR couldn't do it, I doubt you could.
It has been done before. Ancient times granted but it shall be done so again.


Im not invading anyways, im liberating them from the Taliban and oppressive french
 
It has been done before. Ancient times granted but it shall be done so again.
Im not invading anyways, im liberating them from the Taliban and oppressive french
You mean by Alexander? No, he failed, basically killed him anyways.


It might not be seen that way from the Afghanis, it will look more like your invading and the 'brave' Taliban is protecting them with Allah's sword. You never know.
 
Ive spread propaganda inside ti saying that the French are abusing the Syrians and working with the Taliban to kill and abuse AFhanistani citizens. Plus the Iranian Army is backed by Qasem Solemani, the most influential and respected Muslim leader in the world. he will promise the Afghanistani people that no harm will come to them and Iranain is only there to help them
 
The Taliban are a VERY difficult group to defeat.


It's not centralized warfare, IE they don't have any specific targets to attack. No capital city, no well known military bases, no production facilities.


Fighting a country is easier since you KNOW where to attack. Guerrilla warfare is rather difficult. The Taliban (and a group similar to them, the Mujahideen) defeated the USSR and NATO (a decades long war isn't really a victory for anyone though) so I do doubt Iran's ability to defeat the Taliban. Unless Iran is willing to disregard civilian welfare and just destroy anything that is surrounding a Taliban base. Which would most likely be near civilians anyways.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RIPSaidCone said:
The Taliban are a VERY difficult group to defeat.
It's not centralized warfare, IE they don't have any specific targets to attack. No capital city, no well known military bases, no production facilities.


Fighting a country is easier since you KNOW where to attack. Guerrilla warfare is rather difficult. The Taliban (and a group similar to them, the Mujahideen) defeated the USSR and NATO (a decades long war isn't really a victory for anyone though) so I do doubt Iran's ability to defeat the Taliban. Unless Iran is willing to disregard civilian welfare and just destroy anything that is surrounding a Taliban base. Which would most likely be near civilians anyways.
What ever it takes. This isn't just about taking land, its about radical Islam versus Qasem's Islam. Besides I only want to take the Hisa, regions. WIll leave the rets of it to be under Militayr rule.
 
Bobisdead123 said:
Ive spread propaganda inside ti saying that the French are abusing the Syrians and working with the Taliban to kill and abuse AFhanistani citizens. Plus the Iranian Army is backed by Qasem Solemani, the most influential and respected Muslim leader in the world. he will promise the Afghanistani people that no harm will come to them and Iranain is only there to help them
How the French would be absuing Afghani citizens is beyond me since the French only hold the small region near Damascus.
 
Bobisdead123 said:
What ever it takes. This isn't just about taking land, its about radical Islam versus Qasem's Islam. Besides I only want to take the Hisa, regions. WIll leave the rets of it to be under Militayr rule.
Then you would have to completely disregard civilians in the combat area. A large reason why the US and it's coalition is currently failing to effectively GET RID of the Taliban is because they're too pressured by politics and social media to limit civilian casualties. The US is scared that it's population will turn against the War on Terror if it ends up killing civilians accidentally due to them being around Taliban locations.


So Iran would probably have to just say "Fuck it." And kill anything that is or is near Taliban.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top