Saccharine Cyanide
One part sweet, two parts poison
I'll respect that, but I think the simulation theory isn't substantial, or, at least evidence such as that isn't. How we model our universe is, by necessity, technically just abstract no matter how accurate it is. You can make a 1:1 perfectly replicated statue of a person, or even a clone, but it isn't the original person. I personally think someone saying "We found computer code in string theory' is akin to saying "I found paint in the mona lisa". Nonetheless, the simulation theory is fascinating to think about. Of course, it also just raises further questions; it really just moves the problem. It's like 'earth life originated on another planet', well, how did life originate on that other planet? You get what I'm saying?
2
I think it's more like "the woman in the Mona Lisa has no eyebrows." Maybe it means that there's some great secret to the Mona Lisa to be uncovered...or maybe Da Vinci just didn't have time to paint the eyebrows. : P
Yeah, I agree. Right now it's just an interesting "maybe" with not a lot of evidence.