ConfusingSerenity
New Member
Just something interesting I saw, and wanted to see what other people thought.
...So thoughts?
...So thoughts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The lifespan was this short because there was less technology, hence less medicine. Hence, more disease. Hence, more disease in water.Zhia said:if this is saying the reason we die around that age is because of oxegyn being poisonous i'd say it's kind of a silly notion to think about. The average lifespan of a human increases little by little each year. I mean think back a couple thousand years ago. The average lifespan a while ago was 50 and even further back 30 and even further back 25-27. Now of course I acknowledge the possibility of us growing immune to it but i think it's more likely that it's far from deadly where humans are concerned (at least with the amount we recieve)
My point was saying oxygen wasn't the primary cause but yes you are indeed right. Humans are constantly expanding in ways of knowledge in technology which further extends their lifespan it seems.Nirvana said:The lifespan was this short because there was less technology, hence less medicine. Hence, more disease. Hence, more disease in water.
While accurate, I'd just like to jot in that these statistics are misleading. They are so low due to the high infant mortality rate. Among adults who survived past, say, 3, age was a lot higher, reaching 50-70 depending on the time period / area. Our modern medicine has vastly improved infant and child mortality as well as prolonged the lifespan of the diseased, however the maximum human life expectancy at any given time period has only been changed by ~10 years (rather than ~50 years as is commonly misconceived) by these advancements.Zhia said:I mean think back a couple thousand years ago. The average lifespan a while ago was 50 and even further back 30 and even further back 25-27.
You are right. Although I won't go into deeply, breathing 100% oxygen is bad. Dry air contains contains 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and other small gases. So we only breath about 20% of oxygen.WolphNight said:I read somewhere that oxygen IS actually poisonous if it's pure oxygen. The oxygen we breath is only a small percent of real oxygen. So, yeah.
Athral said:You are right. Although I won't go into it deeply, breathing 100% oxygen is bad. Dry air contains contains 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and other small gases. So we only breath about 20% of oxygen.
The poison you are talking about has to do with pressurized oxygen molecules in a 100% oxygen enriched enviroment, it can make your lungs sick, convulsions & tremors. The term is a misnomor as the crew of Apollo 11 used 100% decompressed oxygen for weeks.WolphNight said:I read somewhere that oxygen IS actually poisonous if it's pure oxygen. The oxygen we breath is only a small percent of real oxygen. So, yeah.