Solfi
One Thousand Club
Never said they didn't... Looking through their art though, there has been a lot less stuff that made me get shivers down my spine than the stuff from WW.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As in,"The crunchy bits from the old books no longer work with the crunchy bits from the new books." As in;Stillborn said:I still don't unserstand what's "incompatible".
-S
Not directly. But in that sense Power Combat from the PG is "incompatible" with 1st Edition.operations said:As in,"The crunchy bits from the old books no longer work with the crunchy bits from the new books." As in;
I've looked into it. The Demo had enough of the rules to get a fair idea of how it works. I like a few things, like I said (the Anima automatic at 11+ motes, for example) and will probaly house rule those in to our 1st edition game.Have you looked into the 2nd Edition system to see how it works, and find it insufficently compatible, or are you just assuming?
Sure you can. Converting the Charm mechanics is trivial. The eventual Lunars 2.0 book may have totally different Charm trees, but so what?uteck said:You can't run a 2e game at the moment with Lunars.
Isn't a store for miles and miles up here that carry Exalted these days. Â I got into it when I still lived in the capital area MI rather than the great redneck north. While I love it up here, and my kids are safer, and I'm a lot less jumpy and stressed, it is part of the MI bible belt, and we're lucky to have a game store with Warhammer 40K and D&D. I'm not going to order a book I can't look at first.Having picked it up, and am currently reading through it, I think that your fears are unfounded. Â
Borrow a book and give it a perusal--a real one, not just the demo, which was 2E's weak and dyspepsic sister. Â
And to answer that, if another C&P and link won't be too immature for you:archaratar said:And while lots of people either don't remember or choose to ignore it, GCG said in a couple of developer chats that if Exalted was ever given a revision, it would only be the core, and only to clean up the Solar charms to the level of quality of later books, and maybe in intergrate some of power combat.
++Where or when did they say this? Can you show us where?
So, yeah, we expected changes. Some stuff to streamline charms, combat, etc. Not a complete replacement of a 30+ book libray of games. Two abilities are gone, replaced with two new ones. No prior weapons will use the same stats, with the changes in combat. No, fluff is not invalidated, but almost nothing with stats can't be used without house rules now. Â We also expected a bit of time, not less than a year after the Autobot book.rules_law_student (May 5, 2005 9:54:10 PM)
Will Exalted be revised, and what do anticipate will be the extent of Exalted Revised?
geoffrey c grabowski (May 5, 2005 9:56:00 PM)
It will be revised some day, that is for sure. I anticipate the extent will be moderate. Nothing formal about the rules will be changed, but there might be significant revisions to the elements of that structure. There will be Trees and Charms and most of them will have the same names and relationships.
geoffrey c grabowski (May 5, 2005 9:56:24 PM)
But the mechanics and specifics will be up for flux.
geoffrey c grabowski (May 5, 2005 9:56:58 PM)
Likewise, many elements of the combat system will probably be retained, like the order of modifier operations, but various specific steps of the combat event may see alteration.
geoffrey c grabowski (May 5, 2005 9:57:42 PM)
In terms of timeframe, I would anticipate it will be someday. Not incredibly soon, not when you are a little old gamer in a wheelchair.
 6 days? Arch's unearthed topics older than six weeks.operations said:This topic had been dead and closed for 6 days, and you come back with that. Now who's trolling?
:lol:archaratar said:Write like an Eclipse, not like a Fire Caste.
...
Be the Eclipse!
I'm sorry, I could not understand a word there. Is there supposed to be one sentance or two? Maybe three?Safim said:Actually you are just looking for a cheap way out ops, basically he is saying that you throw a tantrum and you know he is right that is why you start the namecalling. cheap.