I was more asking if we were going to be rolling stats, using a point buy, fixed stats or some other assigned numbers for our attributes.Sherwood attributes are likely going to be just as 5e. As far as I know at least, granted I haven't actually physically played d&d but I've seen my share of Critical Role :^)
That is one good thing about the dice roller here. You can't fudge your numbers. I would personally suggest either a point buy or a fixed array of stats that we assign where we wish.
Might as well, just so we all know what each other are kind of gunning for class and species wise. I can go two ways, with an atypical variant human fighter or a very useful half-elf ranger.
Ellya
earlier, they are open to ‘homebrew’ and ‘non-vanilla’ classes and ideas as long as it is not ludicrous in nature (like being a burger Knight for example) or have enough details to work as a class by itself.
Well, as said by
As shown here:
Ellya
required the content to be official in some capacity, as in made by Wizards of the Coast.
What do you mean? Between a Fighter and a Ranger? Everything is pretty balanced because it's 5e, if we need a strong hitter that you won't need to worry about dying as often then a fighter would be optimal. If you want a character that can contribute to exploration and excels mainly in a group environment, then the ranger is a good option. Either would serve it's purpose though.
The character I'd have planned for the fighter is more original than the ranger. More extroverted and action-oriented, which would be interesting to write the mindset and progression of as the character interacts with others.
So that would be a fighter, yeah? Probably Battlemaster with a long-ranged fighting style?
They are, but not exactly tacticians.
