Jakk Bey
One Thousand Club
OS--I think that you're trying to link genetics with cultural imperatives--and as an anthropologist it's good to be able to disengage the two.
Europeans indeed were an aggressive people. Â Less to do with their genetics than it has to do with resources and the cultures that came into contact with them, and how they all got together.
In Europe, you got a lucky break for domesticatable species, fairly good deposits of materials and resources, and a good number of traders and exchanges, and the benifits of being knocked the fuck out by the Romans who gave them some culture when they were roaming around in woad and barely woven clothing.
The Romans had the lucky break to being savage little fuckers who stole the best from those around them, and had the good sense to build an empire based on sharing their good fortune with a selected few, who in turn took care of dissent and problems in their homelands, and made sure tribute flowed. Â Without the Romans, the Europeans would never have advanced, because they were some backward motherfuckers. Â Instead, they got to pick off the bones of the Roman Empire, and the fruits of their labor. Â And in good competition with their neighbors, they advanced their war machines pretty well. Â They were luckier, to be united in one religion, which gave them a common ground--and with a ruling gentry that traded members back and forth, it was a much more homogenized culture than a lot of folks like to admit.
You get conquored by the Romans, and treated to their version of "civilization" you come out one way. Â You get conquored by the Chinese and treated to their version of "civilization" you get another. Â You throw off the yoke of the Romans, but don't have the range of domesticatable species, or the ready resources that the Europeans had, you get Africa. Â Especiallay when you add in Christianity without a strong rival faith, like Islam had with Christianity and Judaism, and still with the Hindus, and the other, much older cultures that they had strong ties with in the Middle East.
Instead, in Europe, you had a barbarian people who were thrust into the role of civilized folk, and given a culture whole cloth, and with great motivation to not really refer back to those "heathen" days, you get a monoculture. Â Not quite the mix that you got elsewhere. Â
European aggressiveness has much less to do with genetics, as it did with a whole continent of folks who had a case of cultural "short man" syndrome and an abusive father-culture who boot strapped them up the cultural ladder into literacy.
Europeans indeed were an aggressive people. Â Less to do with their genetics than it has to do with resources and the cultures that came into contact with them, and how they all got together.
In Europe, you got a lucky break for domesticatable species, fairly good deposits of materials and resources, and a good number of traders and exchanges, and the benifits of being knocked the fuck out by the Romans who gave them some culture when they were roaming around in woad and barely woven clothing.
The Romans had the lucky break to being savage little fuckers who stole the best from those around them, and had the good sense to build an empire based on sharing their good fortune with a selected few, who in turn took care of dissent and problems in their homelands, and made sure tribute flowed. Â Without the Romans, the Europeans would never have advanced, because they were some backward motherfuckers. Â Instead, they got to pick off the bones of the Roman Empire, and the fruits of their labor. Â And in good competition with their neighbors, they advanced their war machines pretty well. Â They were luckier, to be united in one religion, which gave them a common ground--and with a ruling gentry that traded members back and forth, it was a much more homogenized culture than a lot of folks like to admit.
You get conquored by the Romans, and treated to their version of "civilization" you come out one way. Â You get conquored by the Chinese and treated to their version of "civilization" you get another. Â You throw off the yoke of the Romans, but don't have the range of domesticatable species, or the ready resources that the Europeans had, you get Africa. Â Especiallay when you add in Christianity without a strong rival faith, like Islam had with Christianity and Judaism, and still with the Hindus, and the other, much older cultures that they had strong ties with in the Middle East.
Instead, in Europe, you had a barbarian people who were thrust into the role of civilized folk, and given a culture whole cloth, and with great motivation to not really refer back to those "heathen" days, you get a monoculture. Â Not quite the mix that you got elsewhere. Â
European aggressiveness has much less to do with genetics, as it did with a whole continent of folks who had a case of cultural "short man" syndrome and an abusive father-culture who boot strapped them up the cultural ladder into literacy.