Sorry for the shotgunning posts, but I had to also tackle this comment:Um...no one ever said it did. Most people lived in lavish vcomfort compared to the modern day and sure they had excess' date=' but not to that point. They were not on a genocidal rampage by far...[/quote']
thats what im trying to say.
that people in generla would have been better off if the solars had continued... for all their decadence their buerucracy and socialize charms made things much bette.r
On one hand you suggest that peoples lives would be better if they had just shrugged off the atrocities of the solars and lived in a corrupt and decadant world - slaves in golden chains - than to have overthrown the solars like they did, yet submitting to the comforts of the Realm is intrinsically evil and amoral?
The point, metaphorically, is that the dragon blooded of the second age ARE the solars of the first age, just smaller scale.  The issues at the core of the conflict are identical to those issues that lead to the usurpation.  The only difference is that the DB reign, in and of itself, wont lead to the end of all things.  The sidereals and the DB overthrew the solars because they were insane and decadent and cruel.... it wasn't a coup to sieze power, it was a crusade to end tyranny, a tyranny that the DB in their much more limited capacity cannot recreate.
I just find it strange that morally it is okay to sit back and watch the world sink into chaos because, well, the solars make the best toys, yet it is reprehensible to submit to the will of an empire when the realm is trying to maintain stability in creation.  I find it equally boggling that the Solars have an unimpeachable right to rule over creation which was STOLEN from the primordials and which they GREIVOUSLY abused, yet the DBs, who rose up in the vacuum left by their celestial superiors are corrupt tyrrants who are just out to eat the souls of babies.  Solar propaganda! Don't listen to those Gold Faction Vipers, Man! They lie! It's what they do!