Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ah, but here's where you're wrong. It's a First Person game of Civ 6!Alright, so I'm basically playing a game a Civ 6
Nice character, but I have a small suggestion. My character is already mainly strategical so it would make more sense for you to be more focused towards combat. That way we can sort of organize a clash of personality between them, making the RP more exciting.Name of General: Quintillius Caesar
Gender: Sir
Family: Aelia Flacilla (wife)
Personality: Quintillius is a man known for his daring and quick tactical maneuvers in battle. He is observant and always takes notes on the enemies he faces. He knows how to choose his battles wisely and knows when to quit. Tho many would see this as cowardice, he see's it as an opportunity to better prepare for the next battle. He also considers himself as an equal amongst the populace and his own troops. Those who are also commanders within his army are allowed to speak up and add their opinions on a certain issue and such. Outside of his military career he is known to be a charming, kind, and active person. He loves to exercise in his free time and grab a cup of wine with his closest friends or his wife.
Bonus Units: Commands a small army of 500 spearmen and 250 Archers
That's what tactical means buddy, it means that your more up front in the fight while still giving commands. Being a strategic leader is like in your description of being in the back and giving orders down in a chain of command. This character is already set to clash along your character due to us handling our armies differently.Nice character, but I have a small suggestion. My character is already mainly strategical so it would make more sense for you to be more focused towards combat. That way we can sort of organize a clash of personality between them, making the RP more exciting.
I'm not your buddy, bro. They are still quite similar, in my own words I would say strategy is looking at the bigger scope, while tactics are plans for a battle, that is what I meant my character to be. Also your line "Tho many would see this as cowardice, he see's it as an opportunity to better prepare for the next battle." is shockingly similar to my "His detractors accuse him of being a coward, but one must not mistake strategy for weakness, Maximus does not fight any battle he feels he cannot win." I'm sure it wasn't intentional, but it did give off a very similar vibe. I was sort of hoping that it would be strategy/tactics versus combat skill alone, but it is your character after all so you can do whatever you want. It was only a suggestion, I hope you see there was nothing personal about it.That's what tactical means buddy, it means that your more up front in the fight while still giving commands. Being a strategic leader is like in your description of being in the back and giving orders down in a chain of command. This character is already set to clash along your character due to us handling our armies differently.
Yeah the similarities were coincidence which I will change in a bit, however I still believe that being tactical and strategical are different. First off being strategic is not just looking at a bigger scope its also part of planning. Being strategic is doing the right thing while a tactician is doing things right you either fill in the plan to someone or you personally put the plan into action.For example Hannibal is a high shining example of being a tactician who involves himself up close in battle in order to give orders quickly and efficiently which nowadays not many generals would do. Traditional Generals prefer to stay in the back and relay their orders down the chain of command, receiving information on how battles are going or watching from afar and sending out messengers and whatnot. Both of course have there goods and bad, also as far as I know your CS states that your character prefers to stay in the back while mine prefers to be up front alongside his troops. Tho I'm not sure why your character would be called a coward considering many historical Roman politicians who were appointed as generals have stayed behind their line of troops which I don't see why it would be seen as cowardice as long as they are in the presence of their men and relaying orders. Retreating your army because you feel that you are not ready or strong to face your foe is seen in this age as a huge disgrace. Anyways enough of my squabble, My point is I'll try to shake it up a bit in wording or change/add a bit more.I'm not your buddy, bro. They are still quite similar, in my own words I would say strategy is looking at the bigger scope, while tactics are plans for a battle, that is what I meant my character to be. Also your line "Tho many would see this as cowardice, he see's it as an opportunity to better prepare for the next battle." is shockingly similar to my "His detractors accuse him of being a coward, but one must not mistake strategy for weakness, Maximus does not fight any battle he feels he cannot win." I'm sure it wasn't intentional, but it did give off a very similar vibe. I was sort of hoping that it would be strategy/tactics versus combat skill alone, but it is your character after all so you can do whatever you want. It was only a suggestion, I hope you see there was nothing personal about it.
S Shabazz I'm liking the start , so how should we respond? Do we decide on an response and then let you put it into writing or do we narrate our perspective of events and the response? This is the first RP I've joined that actually started, so I am not sure how to proceed. Perhaps I will just wait and see what other people do.Ait we gud fam, I finally got it done!
https://www.rpnation.com/threads/from-the-ground-up.349521/
Lol, yeah just respond in character.S Shabazz I'm liking the start , so how should we respond? Do we decide on an response and then let you put it into writing or do we narrate our perspective of events and the response? This is the first RP I've joined that actually started, so I am not sure how to proceed. Perhaps I will just wait and see what other people do.