Agent
Lance
If only I had a cinder block to toss on the gas pedal of that mower... but probably not, so let's stay stealthy.
1. Food is ours, so let's not do anything reckless.
1. Food is ours, so let's not do anything reckless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm siding with Jake and Pryno(So ViciousVip3R does this mean you are siding with official clown business and Pryno or are you going with Agent and gonna cause a tie?)
I'm a bit confused by your reasoning: you state that the sheriff is a huge liability due to his tendency to rely on emotion over reason, but then say that you want to convince the sheriff to come with us. At this point everyone significantly under the age of 18 is a liability, so I would think that the only reason to try and convince the rest to come with us is for the expertise of the sheriff and lunch ladies. Could you clarify?I want to save as many people as possible. And if I learned one thing from the Walking Dead (the games and the serie), it's that one unstable member in the group can make everything more difficult, if not getting others killed. The sheriff is that guy. He's similar to Jack from the Lord of the flies. Governed by his feelings rather than by his reason, he wants to lead and to be the hero regardless of risks for others. 3.
(I think he meant, he's terrible for leading.)I'm a bit confused by your reasoning: you state that the sheriff is a huge liability due to his tendency to rely on emotion over reason, but then say that you want to convince the sheriff to come with us. At this point everyone significantly under the age of 18 is a liability, so I would think that the only reason to try and convince the rest to come with us is for the expertise of the sheriff and lunch ladies. Could you clarify?
(Let me play devil's advocate for a second here, even if you are just an office worker, by no means does that mean you are stupid, I give ample choice to pick a more logical choice over foolish ones someone in a movie or something might pick to add drama, with that in mind, it's not really Greg who is managing things here, it's you all, the people who have put up with my shit for all this time. (I just hope I give you guys good shit to read and reply to almost every day lol) it's up to you whether you make the right choice as a group to lead Greg and the others that you might take on to survival... or death, so you wouldn't be raising false hope unless you were to make stupid decisions on purpose. Besides take a look at all the info I provide because I showed their plan for survival isn't infallible. I just wanted to drop my 2 cents in there and play devil's advocate for a moment especially since it felt like a good time for me to say something and, not to completely take a biased side here.)Hmm, on the contrary I think that the sheriff is being too logical. He is hesitant to take risks because he knows the blood will be on his hands, so he is insisting on staying in a location that he knows is secure. It doesn't seem like he is acting out of pride, either. He is insisting that anyone under the legal age stay with him, which he believes is the best option, but is not protesting the decisions made by others to leave, or prevent them from taking their family. I think that because of his law enforcement background, he is trying to enforce order through a way of life that is familiar to him and utilizing a informal chain of command. That is not necessarily wrong, and the other adults all seem entirely content with this situation so I don't think that the kids will necessarily be in bad hands here, they have survived for so long anyways.
Other than reasons of mortality(any concern of the sheriff being undependable is unfounded, so I see no problem leaving them here...At least their blood is not on our hands if they die), I see no reason for us to take the burden of protecting and feeding so many extra mouths. Any child care taker knows that children are not the most understanding or cooperative people, so they could really endanger us if we encounter zombies. On the other hand, the group of people we have gathered so far are just entering their prime, so they should all be able to contribute to some extent. In addition, I don't think our character even has the skills to ensure the survival of such a huge group of people(remember that we are just an office worker and our survival so far has depended on sneaking past zombies) so it would be irresponsible to claim otherwise and raise their hopes for nothing. They would be better off here, and we would be better off without them.
1.