OOC

Sorry about Canada and Mexico but I just can't find any maps I liked that included them. As for why west Texas is now east Texas is because I thought it looked better and Texas agreed. And no BOS has the sexiest armor. Look at all that sexy lack of weaknesses. That is how I rate armor.
 
Sorry about Canada and Mexico but I just can't find any maps I liked that included them. As for why west Texas is now east Texas is because I thought it looked better and Texas agreed. And no BOS has the sexiest armor. Look at all that sexy lack of weaknesses. That is how I rate armor.

I think you forget how we're also currently the only faction with X-02 power armor in a significant quantity.
 
Sorry about Canada and Mexico but I just can't find any maps I liked that included them. As for why west Texas is now east Texas is because I thought it looked better and Texas agreed. And no BOS has the sexiest armor. Look at all that sexy lack of weaknesses. That is how I rate armor.

BOS armour is shit.


It stops people dying


Lack of weakness is the ultimate weakness of fun.
 
Sorry about Canada and Mexico but I just can't find any maps I liked that included them. As for why west Texas is now east Texas is because I thought it looked better and Texas agreed. And no BOS has the sexiest armor. Look at all that sexy lack of weaknesses. That is how I rate armor.

Only because you want to have stupid counties


Making lines all straight and shit
 
This one has Florida now

image.jpeg


I'm just stating for the record that there is still no way the Texas faction has the population it does. Sure, it definitely has more than it would've previously, but it obviously can't have the entire postwar population of the state and then some, and by then some, I mean 100,000 extra people. 
 
It has somewhere between 80%-90% of the people in the state.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Opinion? What can I improve?

1,713,726 people?


Isn't the rule 4%? I doubt there's a few hundred thousand people living in the deserts of Nevada and the little bit of Oregon that the NCR has.
 
Yes, my map is far better at guaging what populations people can have 

That is why we have more than one map of things. We have like thousands of maps of earth, New York city, London, Smallville USA, etc each showingredients different things like minerals population, borders etc. So if we only had one map it would quickly become useless as your needs changed.
 
That is why we have more than one map of things. We have like thousands of maps of earth, New York city, London, Smallville USA, etc each showingredients different things like minerals population, borders etc. So if we only had one map it would quickly become useless as your needs changed.

That doesn't apply here.
 
Each map shows a different perspective. Like if you asked an Israeli to draw a map they wouldn't include Palestine in there.
 
Each map shows a different perspective. Like if you asked an Israeli to draw a map they wouldn't include Palestine in there.

And Israils map would be wrong..... If you asked Putin to draw a map most of Europe would be in Russia..


Also, have a Wonderful Winter feasting all.
 
And Israils map would be wrong..... If you asked Putin to draw a map most of Europe would be in Russia..


Also, have a Wonderful Winter feasting all.

Sorry bad example, but you get the point. More maps=better. One might be more accurate in some things say showing places other than the US. But another might give a more detailed look at the borders. (And yes I know that some lines are still straight I'm working on it)
 
Sorry bad example, but you get the point. More maps=better. One might be more accurate in some things say showing places other than the US. But another might give a more detailed look at the borders. (And yes I know that some lines are still straight I'm working on it)

I will continue to roar and argue until lines that need to die, do so. And while more maps could be better, does not mean all maps are useful


Also, had a good Wintermas?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top