• This section is for roleplays only.
    ALL interest checks/recruiting threads must go in the Recruit Here section.

    Please remember to credit artists when using works not your own.

Fandom Fate/Drifters ooc

That is one way to put it. In your narrow-minded eyes, I may very well be evil.

That being said, if you truly want to save Fafnir from a most terrible ruin, then you will free her from my grasp, and not that of Shani!


Can we stop this conversation? It's quickly going from tiresome to annoying. It probably sounds selfish, but it's what I'm asking.

I feel like the more we linger around this topic, the higher the chances of it exploding.

Hm, alright then. I probably just don't feel any tension cause I'm dense like that.
 
Xel Xel LostHaven LostHaven Stop your bickering at once! The Arms of Shani do not wish for this conflict and bid it stop. We preach love, not war. Harmony, not Dominance. Acceptance, not enforcement. After all, it says in our holy texts (The Book Of Shani) Yuri: 11: 8-9

8: And should Shani come unto your door and knock upon them, saying let me in that we may lay together, and you and you answer and open your doors unto her; verily she will take you into her arms and her arms will be gentle and full of love.

9: But should Shani come unto your door and knock upon them, saying let me in that we may lay together, and you neither answer nor open your doors unto her: verily she will leave from your door and no ill will shall be left behind.

If one does not wish to come to Shani's arms then let them go in peace, as it is not the Crimson Wifu's way to force her affections upon those unwilling. But neither should those who choose not to follow pity those that enter into her embrace, for within her arms is found peace and protection.
HAHAHAHA! FOOL! YOUR SCRIPTURES AMOUNT TO NOTHING

THY FATE ART SEALED, FOOL! NOW DANCE, DEAR BERSERKER OF LIGHT! DANCE TO THE WHEELS OF FATE THAT WILL BETRAY YOU! YOUR DEAR CASTER OF LIGHT IS NAUGHT BUT A VESSEL THROUGH WHICH I WILL TORMENT HER AND HER FRIENDS FOR MY OWN ENTERTAINMENT!

BWAHAHAHAHA
Hm, alright then. I probably just don't feel any tension cause I'm dense like that.
It's more that I sometimes start drama for fun because I'm bored.
 
HAHAHAHA! FOOL! YOUR SCRIPTURES AMOUNT TO NOTHING

THY FATE ART SEALED, FOOL! NOW DANCE, DEAR BERSERKER OF LIGHT! DANCE TO THE WHEELS OF FATE THAT WILL BETRAY YOU! YOUR DEAR CASTER OF LIGHT IS NAUGHT BUT A VESSEL THROUGH WHICH I WILL TORMENT HER AND HER FRIENDS FOR MY OWN ENTERTAINMENT!

BWAHAHAHAHA
...
...
...
Yep...
This is definitely happening...
So, basically, what you're saying is that you're the supreme evil and that Vita and Shani will eventually team up to defeat you and end the series with an ambiguous friendship that may or may not require yuri goggles to see the undertones.
 
It will be the plot of one episode in the OVA / Carnival Phantasm thing we were talking about before. The characters breaking the forth wall and fighting their creators to save their freind.
 
...
...
...
Yep...
This is definitely happening...
Weak-willed worms! I will await thee beyond the fourth reality! Bwahahaha!

Hits head on table by accident

Huh??? Oh, sorry, irl me just got a bit wild. DW, I'm not actually evil enough to do any of that. Honest.

: )
 
Hmm... It's more that I've gotten bored of of it so I'm kind of tempted to spark something up.

I'm an asshole, I know xD

I certainly don't think so. If a topic bores you or makes you uncomfortable, it's better to let it be known.

I'm an introvert so small talk /superficial conversations tend to bore me.
 
Welp. Wish me luck, gotta wake up at 5:45 tomorrow just to arrive in time for an activity to last me the whole day... hiking chest high in water in the mangroves. Yaaay.
 
Yep. Age of Gods definitely existed then.

Tbh, the fictional vs non-fictional Servants still confuses me a little (since I've never really considered someone like King Arthur to be possibly real). I mean, googling Kojiro, there is a wiki about him being rivals with Musashi. More details about him than many other Servants...and his existence fits the 'well there's no proof that he didn't exist' more than someone like Frankenstein who's a novel character for example. Most myths are pretty much works of fiction. Would characters from Romance of the Three kingdoms be works of fiction? How about William Tell or the Headless Horseman? What makes creepypasta characters less believable than characters from the Iliad?

Sasaki Kojiro existed, Assassin didn't. He was just some rando who received powers based on Kojiro's legend. It goes back to the whole thing where servants have a LOT of abilities and powers they never had in life due to their legends. Caster was able to summon a fake servant that had powers and abilities based on Kojiro, despite not actually BEING Kojiro. It's basically the same thing as Mash in FGO having Galahad's abilities despite not being Galahad, this was allowed because of Caster's NP.

As for your last rapid-fire questions I'll just skip the last. Creepypasta characters, and other fictional ones, don't work because they are patently proveably false with zero basis in reality. You're right that a lot of mythical beings are fictional, but those myths are based on someone and something. It's like the often cited "Jesus was a real man who really lived, he just wasn't the son of christ". These people ACTUALLY existed, just not necessarily in the way their stories portray them. But Slenderman never existed, it isn't merely an embellished story being retold for centuries and being warped because of it. It's objectively, proveably, fake. As I mentioned, to summon a servant you need a soul to ascribe the legend to. Kojiro ACTUALLY existed, he was a farmer in the area, just some rando nobody, his soul existed and thus the grail molded the legend of kojiro around him. Who would you mold the slenderman legend around? Nobody. Because it can't just be ANY soul, it has to be close to/related to the source. Like how Jack was the soul of the kids killed.

You can't prove Hercules never existed. You can categorically prove Slenderman doesn't exist, or Master Chief, or Sonic, or Naruto. Basically, it's the difference between embellished stories and fictional ones. Embellished stories have a kernel of truth at their center, fictional ones don't. And you can't summon something that never existed to begin with.

So...Kotomine's father gave him back the command seals? The anime made it seem like the grail did it...especially since it just randomly appeared on back on Kirei's hand, unlike how the Overseer gave Kenneth a command seal. Bet he didn't plan on his son killing Tousaka and stealing Archer, given he who he wanted to win the war^^

There's a special process, a ritual, that allows the transferral of command seals. Only overseers know it. Since Kotomine was being groomed to be the next overseer he knew it and used it to take the command seals. Grail played no part, dude just used a program to enact a specific function programmed into the grail.
 
Hm, alright then. I probably just don't feel any tension cause I'm dense like that.
You don't feel any tension because there is none to feel, it's just you learning the rules of the Grail War and me explaining them. There's as much tension here as there is in math class.
 
Everything's on the Typemoon wiki as well. It's also worth giving that a glance if unsure about stuff.
 
You don't feel any tension because there is none to feel, it's just you learning the rules of the Grail War and me explaining them. There's as much tension here as there is in math class.
You'd be surprised how scary math classes can be.
 
Welp. Wish me luck, gotta wake up at 5:45 tomorrow just to arrive in time for an activity to last me the whole day... hiking chest high in water in the mangroves. Yaaay.
Gross over-exaggeration, I assure you. It can't be scarier than me on Ike/Lucina while on four cans of energy drinks.
 
Assassin didn't. He was just some rando who received powers based on Kojiro's legend.

This I didn't know. But it makes sense now why Kojiro was referred to as a fictional Servant. Rather than fictional, I'd just call him not a real Servant. I mean, if his soul is that of a rando dude and not a heroic spirit...

As for your last rapid-fire questions I'll just skip the last. Creepypasta characters, and other fictional ones, don't work because they are patently proveably false with zero basis in reality. You're right that a lot of mythical beings are fictional, but those myths are based on someone and something. It's like the often cited "Jesus was a real man who really lived, he just wasn't the son of christ". These people ACTUALLY existed, just not necessarily in the way their stories portray them. But Slenderman never existed, it isn't merely an embellished story being retold for centuries and being warped because of it. It's objectively, proveably, fake. As I mentioned, to summon a servant you need a soul to ascribe the legend to. Kojiro ACTUALLY existed, he was a farmer in the area, just some rando nobody, his soul existed and thus the grail molded the legend of kojiro around him. Who would you mold the slenderman legend around? Nobody. Because it can't just be ANY soul, it has to be close to/related to the source. Like how Jack was the soul of the kids killed.

You can't prove Hercules never existed. You can categorically prove Slenderman doesn't exist, or Master Chief, or Sonic, or Naruto. Basically, it's the difference between embellished stories and fictional ones. Embellished stories have a kernel of truth at their center, fictional ones don't. And you can't summon something that never existed to begin with.

I understand the soul requirement. It's just difficult for me to differentiate between the ones that 'can't be proved to never exist' vs the ones that 'can't be proved to exist'. Probably why I end up letting a lot of Servants slide through as possible. Frankenstein, for example, is the fictional character of a novel with a known author and everything. Yet they were summoned as a Servant in Apocrypha. If we follow Fate lore in that a soul is required, then Frankenstein's story is an embellished story with a kernel of truth...that I don't really see. I guess my problem is that some of these stories are so embellished, the line separating them from pure fiction is really thin to me.

Slenderman feels like fictional folklore to me. If someone came and told me that their oc Servant Slenderman was based on an exaggerated tale of a murderer that existed (spread through the internet), I'd almost believe them.

Naruto and sonic I can understand saying no to =P

But with many fairy tales...I don't know. For me, they are all fictional. But a person could also argue there's a kernel of truth to some of them...and how could I argue if Hercules is an example? I mean, yes I can't prove Hercules didn't exist (anymore than I can prove Alice in wonderland didn't exist)...but where's the kernel of truth in Hercules legend? How do I know he's based off of some existing person who had their story embellished? Perhaps the author of Alice in wonderland wrote the story based on his crazy niece who he used to have who was stuck in the 'wonderland' of her head all the time. In that case, Alice could be a Servant...

The requirements for the throne of heroes isn't exactly clear cut either...because it looks like even villains can be in it.

Everything's on the Typemoon wiki as well. It's also worth giving that a glance if unsure about stuff.

I've been reading a bit...but it to be honest, there's so much stuff, it gets a little confusing.
 
Last edited:
This I didn't know. But it makes sense now why Kojiro was referred to as a fictional Servant. Rather than fictional, I'd just call him not a real Servant. I mean, if his soul is that of a rando dude and not a heroic spirit...

He was a servant in all practical terms. He operated under all the same mechanics. He just wasn't a proper heroic spirit or summoned by a proper master. Having a NP that literally cheats the system allows for wonky shit.

I understand the soul requirement. It's just difficult for me to differentiate between the ones that 'can't be proved to never exist' vs the ones that 'can be proved to exist'. Probably why I end up letting a lot of Servants slide through as possible. Frankenstein, for example, is the fictional character of a novel with a known author and everything. Yet they were summoned as a Servant in Apocrypha. If we follow Fate lore in that a soul is required, then Frankenstein's story is an embellished story with a kernel of truth...that I don't really see. I guess my problem is that some of these stories are so embellished, the line separating them from pure fiction is really thin to me.

Frankenstein is the character of a novel, but it falls under the same situation as Sherlock Holmes in that the direct character is fictional, but it's based on a real person. So you get a situation similar to Kojiro or Vlad, where you have the soul of the original person and they're given abilities and powers based on the fictional stories surrounding them. You'll note that Frankenstein isn't a guy, she was a girl, despite the story saying it was a man. The story was based on something that actually happened, but the source event did still happen. And the line is thin, so a good rule of thumb is "only old things". You can embellish frankenstein, you can say it was based on the machinations of some magus, it falls under suspension of disbelief. You bring in MODERN things and we can't ignore, we know beyond a shadow of a doubt it's fake. Hell the author is still alive, you can literally go ask the creator that it's all make believe. You can't do that with Frankenstein's author, so there's the possibility it was based on a true story. The line is really just about suspension of disbelief, and for most anything still living crosses that line. That's why World War 2 is, essentially, the absolute cut-off. Anything more recent than that and we just know too much, it's too fresh in our minds, information is too easily accessible to prove it one way or the other.


Slenderman feels like fictional folklore to me. If someone came and told me that their oc Servant Slenderman was based on an exaggerated tale of a murderer that existed (spread through the internet), I'd almost believe them.

Naruto and sonic I can understand saying no to =P

Problem is Slenderman falls in the exact same category as Sonic or Naruto, it's equally as fictional, equally as PROVEN fictional. You can literally just go ask the original creator. All the players know, for a fact, it's fake. There's no ability for suspension of disbelief. Allowing Slenderman would be like allowing Master Chief as Archer. It ruins the experience. Like I said, we can suspend our disbelief and accept that Frankenstein was a magus who created a homuncullus, after all such things already exist in Fate. It's far harder to accept something like Slenderman since we know it's fake, it's only a few years old, and it's author is still alive and can tell us it's fake.

But with many fairy tales...I don't know. For me, they are all fictional. But a person could also argue there's a kernel of truth to some of them...and how could I argue if Hercules is an example? I mean, yes I can't prove Hercules didn't exist (anymore than I can prove Alice in wonderland didn't exist)...but where's the kernel of truth in Hercules legend? How do I know he's based off of some existing person who had their story embellished? Perhaps the author of Alice in wonderland wrote the story based on his crazy niece who he used to have who was stuck in the 'wonderland' of her head all the time. In that case, Alice could be a Servant...

The requirements for the throne of heroes isn't exactly clear cut either...because it looks like even villains can be in it.

This is why it's ultimately up to the GM and players. Because as you said, they're all fictional, so it comes down to what we're willing to accept in this alt-history that is Fate. It has magic and shit, suspension of disbelief is paramount to enjoying it. But how much disbelief are we meant to suspend? It's pretty easy to accept that Hercules actually existed in a world where dragons and magic actually existed. It's less easy to accept that Slenderman or Katniss Everdeen are real people who actually did anything resembling their fables. Also in your Alice example, she wouldn't be a servant because she was just a crazy kid with a story written about her.

The Throne of Heroes is, basically, where legendary souls go. Despite the name it has nothing to do with good or evil. It's simply powerful souls that transcended humanity, essentially. Their great deeds made their mark on history and helped them reach the throne of heroes. Hence why Alice in your example wouldn't be eligible as a summon. She didn't do anything, she wasn't a great soul, just a crazy kid who's uncle wrote a book based on her delusions. That's part of why all servants are mythical beings, because their souls were powerful and grand enough to go to the throne of heroes. You COULD argue that Alice was, in fact, a very powerful magus closer to the Age of Gods and all her shenanigans were a result of her magic, and thus she was in the throne of heroes and her story would influence her abilities and powers. This is why it always comes down to GM discretion, because most legends can easily be handwaved like that. So it's simply what we're willing to accept.


I've been reading a bit...but it too be honest, there's so much stuff, it gets a little confusing.

The wiki contains everything from the Nasuverse. If you just focus solely on FSN stuff it's not that difficult.

Basically, in short, the TL;DR is that to be a servant you have be a REAL person who ACTUALLY existed who was above normal humans with a powerful soul that would go to the Throne of Heroes on death. As long as you meet these requirements you can be a servant. And a good rule of thumb is "no modern servants" because while it's easy to handwave old ones, as I just did with Alice, it stumbles into cringey multi-verse fandom territory if you accept modern servants. But that is still at the subjective whim of the GM, because the same handwaving can be done.

Edit: Heroic Spirit This might help as well. Mind you this includes stuff from the entirety of the nasuverse, including FGO. So, keep that in mind when reading it.
 
Last edited:
I've been reading a bit...but it too be honest, there's so much stuff, it gets a little confusing.
Nasuverse lore has an issue in that it's all flowery and overwritten as hell. A lot of it could be explained with just like, a checklist, honestly. The most important thing to remember is that every rule in the Nasuverse can and will be broken at some point, probably; Which is why it's as convoluted as it is.
 
Nasuverse lore has an issue in that it's all flowery and overwritten as hell. A lot of it could be explained with just like, a checklist, honestly. The most important thing to remember is that every rule in the Nasuverse can and will be broken at some point, probably; Which is why it's as convoluted as it is.

^ This. That's why I actually prefer just telling it to you here rather than send you to the wiki. Cuz not only is it really flowery and overwritten, but as I said certain things contradict one another yet the wiki does a very poor job of separating those things. It'll all read like one coherent system and that's why people say it's confusing. So you have contradictory systems being written in flowery, embellished ways that make it seem like it's all one system.
 
^ This. That's why I actually prefer just telling it to you here rather than send you to the wiki. Cuz not only is it really flowery and overwritten, but as I said certain things contradict one another yet the wiki does a very poor job of separating those things. It'll all read like one coherent system and that's why people say it's confusing. So you have contradictory systems being written in flowery, embellished ways that make it seem like it's all one system.
b9eae24d36.png
 

It's not bad as long as you can separate the various aspects of the nasuverse, like I've mentioned. Don't mix them. FGO is it's own contained thing, Extra is it's own contained thing, Tsukihime is it's own contained thing, etc etc. If you do that the lore's actually pretty simple and easy to follow.
 
It's not bad as long as you can separate the various aspects of the nasuverse, like I've mentioned. Don't mix them. FGO is it's own contained thing, Extra is it's own contained thing, Tsukihime is it's own contained thing, etc etc. If you do that the lore's actually pretty simple and easy to follow.
I understand it.

I just still hate it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top